14 reviews
A law firm is looking for Judy Jones to inherit $10 million. They decide to advertise and every Judy Jones thinks that she has a chance. Judy Jones (Joan Leslie) is a singer with bandleader Tommy Coles (Robert Alda). They have disagreements about marriage and she keeps pushing him off. It turns out that she is the true heiress. The lawyers are convinced by her shrunken head. Only she has to marry someone with high I. Q. to get the money. She also has to go to college, but she applies to an all-men school. Gabriel Popik (S. Z. Sakall) hopes to get a new building out of the admission despite her lack of smarts. Oliver S. Patch (Elisha Cook Jr.) is a nerd at school. Bart Williams (William Prince) is a professor. Camille (Julie Bishop) is a cabbie.
The premise is non-sense but it's fun. I get the marrying part, but I don't understand that she has to go to this school. I know it's the 40's, but there has to be technical schools that accept ladies. Wait! Did she go to that school to find a smart guy to marry? Or maybe the will stipulates that she has to go to a specific school. The writing needs to be better to explain this story. It's a split decision. This is fun, but it makes no sense. Judy is dumb, but even dumb people needs to make sense.
The premise is non-sense but it's fun. I get the marrying part, but I don't understand that she has to go to this school. I know it's the 40's, but there has to be technical schools that accept ladies. Wait! Did she go to that school to find a smart guy to marry? Or maybe the will stipulates that she has to go to a specific school. The writing needs to be better to explain this story. It's a split decision. This is fun, but it makes no sense. Judy is dumb, but even dumb people needs to make sense.
- SnoopyStyle
- Sep 13, 2024
- Permalink
Band singer and gunshell loader Joan Leslie is surprised to learn that she has inherited ten million dollars. She must be wed by a certain date to inherit. She was going to marry bandleader Robert Alda, but that money implies an obligation. She wants to marry a genius. So she enrols in an all-male college, where she and chemistry professor William Prince irritate each other.
It was shot and finished by the beginning of 1944, which explains the ending, with an army battalion singing "You Never Know Where You're Going" without the help of Mel Blanc. It's one of those kitchen sink musical comedies, with a large supporting cast including S. Z. Sakall, Edward Everett Horton, Julie Bishop, Hobart Cavanaugh.... well, anyone who could play comedy, three songs by Jules Styne and Sammy Kay, and plenty of comic skits disguised as advancing the plot until the next setback. With a script that looks like it just grew like Topsy, it's quite funny at any given moment, even if the ending is.... well, where did the army get that wedding cake?
It was shot and finished by the beginning of 1944, which explains the ending, with an army battalion singing "You Never Know Where You're Going" without the help of Mel Blanc. It's one of those kitchen sink musical comedies, with a large supporting cast including S. Z. Sakall, Edward Everett Horton, Julie Bishop, Hobart Cavanaugh.... well, anyone who could play comedy, three songs by Jules Styne and Sammy Kay, and plenty of comic skits disguised as advancing the plot until the next setback. With a script that looks like it just grew like Topsy, it's quite funny at any given moment, even if the ending is.... well, where did the army get that wedding cake?
Judy's a little short in the IQ department, but she stands to inherit big money if only she can decide which boyfriend to marry.
The pro's don't seem to like the movie much. Maltin calls it silly, which it is. But since when does silliness mean a movie isn't amusing. Okay, maybe my standards aren't high enough, still I found the madcap a lot of fun, with one of the best supporting casts on record. Nonetheless, it's really a Joan Leslie showcase, showing what a lovely and talented light comedienne she is.
Then again, show me any other film where phony tough guy Elisha Cook Jr. dons glasses and plays it for laughs, (Bogart must be turning over in his grave). Then there's 'Cuddles' Sakall who in my book is mainly a matter of taste, but is not too, too cuddly here; at the same time Edward Everett Horton gets a surprisingly non-addled role for a change. And competing for the delectable Ms Leslie are Alan Alda's dad Robert and William Prince as the sleek professor. So who will win. Shrewdly, we don't find out til the end.
To ease things along, there're also a few easy-to-take songs tossed in. But the star is really the fetching Ms Leslie who, for some reason, never quite got the career her talent deserved. Here she plays the lovable Judy with both humor and lots of verve. But whatever you do, don't let her Judy Jones fix you a sandwich, unless you like bubbles on your mayonnaise.
The pro's don't seem to like the movie much. Maltin calls it silly, which it is. But since when does silliness mean a movie isn't amusing. Okay, maybe my standards aren't high enough, still I found the madcap a lot of fun, with one of the best supporting casts on record. Nonetheless, it's really a Joan Leslie showcase, showing what a lovely and talented light comedienne she is.
Then again, show me any other film where phony tough guy Elisha Cook Jr. dons glasses and plays it for laughs, (Bogart must be turning over in his grave). Then there's 'Cuddles' Sakall who in my book is mainly a matter of taste, but is not too, too cuddly here; at the same time Edward Everett Horton gets a surprisingly non-addled role for a change. And competing for the delectable Ms Leslie are Alan Alda's dad Robert and William Prince as the sleek professor. So who will win. Shrewdly, we don't find out til the end.
To ease things along, there're also a few easy-to-take songs tossed in. But the star is really the fetching Ms Leslie who, for some reason, never quite got the career her talent deserved. Here she plays the lovable Judy with both humor and lots of verve. But whatever you do, don't let her Judy Jones fix you a sandwich, unless you like bubbles on your mayonnaise.
- dougdoepke
- Mar 21, 2013
- Permalink
This is a very, very contrived film with a very weak story idea. Considering what great films Warner Brothers usually made, the plot is amazingly poor. It's not surprising, then, that the studio held this film for a long time before it was released--as apparently they, too, knew it was a seriously flawed film.
The film begins with some radio show that is looking for lost people--and in this case it's the missing heir to a $10,000,000 fortune. When Judy Jones (Joan Leslie) is located, she learns that the money isn't hers yet--she must be married by Saturday to a man of genius IQ or the money is to be given to a museum. The problem is that the only guy who might marry her is a bit of a clod--and certainly NOT a genius (Robert Alda). So, Judy decides the best place to find a smart guy is the local technical college and she manages to charm her way into be admitted to school--even though it's an all-male campus and Jones is a complete idiot (I'm talking almost a Gracie Allen-level idiot!). Will this moron get a guy by the deadline...and will the audience even care? Considering that the leading lady is annoying, dumb and pretty self-centered, I sure didn't.
This film proves that even with wonderful character actors like Cuddles Sakall, Ruth Donnelly and Edward Everett Horton you CAN make a bad film. Unlikable characters, a contrived plot, bad writing and unnecessary singing make this a real dud.
The film begins with some radio show that is looking for lost people--and in this case it's the missing heir to a $10,000,000 fortune. When Judy Jones (Joan Leslie) is located, she learns that the money isn't hers yet--she must be married by Saturday to a man of genius IQ or the money is to be given to a museum. The problem is that the only guy who might marry her is a bit of a clod--and certainly NOT a genius (Robert Alda). So, Judy decides the best place to find a smart guy is the local technical college and she manages to charm her way into be admitted to school--even though it's an all-male campus and Jones is a complete idiot (I'm talking almost a Gracie Allen-level idiot!). Will this moron get a guy by the deadline...and will the audience even care? Considering that the leading lady is annoying, dumb and pretty self-centered, I sure didn't.
This film proves that even with wonderful character actors like Cuddles Sakall, Ruth Donnelly and Edward Everett Horton you CAN make a bad film. Unlikable characters, a contrived plot, bad writing and unnecessary singing make this a real dud.
- planktonrules
- Feb 3, 2011
- Permalink
Any flick directed by B. Berkeley, and has Edward E. Horton (small part) can't be ALL bad. Sure, that silly plot is pretty flimsy, but you also have some respectable song and dance numbers, Robert Alda and Joan Leslie, and of course "Cuddles" Sakall as the stubborn Professor. Judy ( Leslie ) and Tommy ( Alda ) work on a radio show that gives away money and prizes, and helps locate long lost relatives. But there are conditions to be met when they DO find the rightful heir, and the conditions are almost more trouble than they are worth... but in this case, its ten million dollars at stake. Also keep an eye out for Elisha Cook as the "roommate" at college... he was the weakling villain in "Maltese Falcon". The running gag in "Cinderella Jones is the list of malaprops said almost non-stop for the second half of the film. Half the cast ends up in jail, and then we're in court trying to straighten it all out, like any good, respectable, farce. Funny to note that in the credits, Sakall's role is listed as Gabriel Popik, but about halfway through the film, everyone starts calling him "Cuddles", his real nickname. Sit back and enjoy the 90 minute story, as long as you're willing to buy into the silliness.
Cut-rate romantic shenanigans from Warner Bros. and director Busby Berkeley features Joan Leslie as a ditsy band singer who stands to inherit $10,000,000 from a deceased relative--provided she marries a man with a high I.Q. under the deadline. Playing the kind of kooky girl who mistakes a bar of soap for cheese and thinks the 17th President of the United States was named Abraham Jefferson, Leslie's wide-eyed, open-mouthed innocent-act gets a strenuous workout here (she's nearly impossible to take). Songs by Jule Styne and Sammy Cahn aren't enough to save the picture, which shoehorns in greedy lawyers, hep-cat professors, and a penniless pianist who wants to "live on love". Poor in all respects, the film sat on the shelf for two years before Warners finally released it. They shouldn't have bothered. NO STARS from ****
- moonspinner55
- Dec 11, 2010
- Permalink
Maybe it's just me, but is no one else troubled by the apparent ability of just about everyone in this movie to change who they love and whom they want to marry almost at will. No concept of everlasting love troubles the writer and certainly will not trouble any ensuing marriage that would come from this movie. I just found it disappointing. Joan Leslie is good enough, but haven't we come too far (even by 1946) than to think it's funny that women are stupid. And just too idiotically stupid to continue living. Unlike other commentators I did not think the bubbles from the mouth bit funny at all, I just thought it dumb. Which pretty well sums up the movie for me.
- beegeebright
- Jul 10, 2005
- Permalink
Busby didn't have the $$ to make any spectacular dance scenes, but the musical numbers are still quite good with some artful but floor-bound camera moves. Joan Leslie is lovely, playing an idiotic bimbo with such charm that we blame the script, not her, for her dumb moves. Which is basically the movie's major problem: the film's best gag, bubbles coming out of a character's mouth, is done to death, indicating a worse lack of intelligence on the part of its makers than the one they ascribe to the funny but obviously smarter-than-the-material Leslie.
Ultimately pretty silly, but Joan Leslie is in it, and so I loved it. She is one of the most under-rated talents Hollywood ever had. She could do anything and everything, besides being incredibly lovely.
She started near the top at a very early age, and starred with some of the biggest names in movies, always holding her own.
Hollywood has never been known for justice, for treating its talent as they deserved, and perhaps Joan Leslie is the prize example.
She should have been that proverbial household name, with her looks, her talent, and the good movies she did perform in.
Obviously, with "Cinderella Jones" as the illustration, she wasn't always in the best pictures, but any she was in became much better for her presence.
She started near the top at a very early age, and starred with some of the biggest names in movies, always holding her own.
Hollywood has never been known for justice, for treating its talent as they deserved, and perhaps Joan Leslie is the prize example.
She should have been that proverbial household name, with her looks, her talent, and the good movies she did perform in.
Obviously, with "Cinderella Jones" as the illustration, she wasn't always in the best pictures, but any she was in became much better for her presence.
- morrisonhimself
- May 9, 2022
- Permalink
This was one of the more fun "B" movies I have seen recently. I am a movie collector who enjoys clean light comedies, and enjoyed this. It stars S.Z. Sakall, so naturally it doesn't try to cover the meaning of life, or contain any heavy-handed social commentary. My kind of movie!!
It has a highly unlikely story line with enough laughs along the way to make it enjoyable. Whether it is a sight gag, plot absurdities, the characters breaking out in song, or "inside" jokes about the actors themselves, it is obvious that everyone involved was having fun.
Joan Leslie plays a naive good girl who works odd jobs, and Robert Alda is a band leader.
Hungarian character actor S.Z Sakall plays a Hungarian professor from Budapest (go figure).
Joan Leslie can inherit ten million dollars if she gets married. But it has to happen very soon, or else the inheritance is off. The movie is spent with Sakall, three young single guys (Alda as band leader, a young professor, and a stalker), and some very eager inheritance lawyers who try to marry off Leslie.
After we are introduced to the characters, Sakall is shown walking around outside and chattering about his old science laboratory and how he wants a new one. Then he remembers that he accidentally left dynamite on the stove in his lab, and seconds later we hear it blow up in the distance. "No new laboratory, now no old laboratory."
He ends up in jail twice in the movie, but not for accidentally blowing up his lab.
A memorable line: (Sakall is on the stand in court):
"For how long have you known the ladies in question?"
"Question, what's question??"
"You DO understand the English language..."
"Yes I understand. I talk English perfect. A couple of years ago I had an accent, but I lose it."
Will Leslie be able to make up her mind on which guy to marry before the clock runs out? Will some lucky guy end up with Leslie? Will Sakall get his funding for a new science lab? Will the inheritance lawyers strike it rich? Watch it to find out!
It has a highly unlikely story line with enough laughs along the way to make it enjoyable. Whether it is a sight gag, plot absurdities, the characters breaking out in song, or "inside" jokes about the actors themselves, it is obvious that everyone involved was having fun.
Joan Leslie plays a naive good girl who works odd jobs, and Robert Alda is a band leader.
Hungarian character actor S.Z Sakall plays a Hungarian professor from Budapest (go figure).
Joan Leslie can inherit ten million dollars if she gets married. But it has to happen very soon, or else the inheritance is off. The movie is spent with Sakall, three young single guys (Alda as band leader, a young professor, and a stalker), and some very eager inheritance lawyers who try to marry off Leslie.
After we are introduced to the characters, Sakall is shown walking around outside and chattering about his old science laboratory and how he wants a new one. Then he remembers that he accidentally left dynamite on the stove in his lab, and seconds later we hear it blow up in the distance. "No new laboratory, now no old laboratory."
He ends up in jail twice in the movie, but not for accidentally blowing up his lab.
A memorable line: (Sakall is on the stand in court):
"For how long have you known the ladies in question?"
"Question, what's question??"
"You DO understand the English language..."
"Yes I understand. I talk English perfect. A couple of years ago I had an accent, but I lose it."
Will Leslie be able to make up her mind on which guy to marry before the clock runs out? Will some lucky guy end up with Leslie? Will Sakall get his funding for a new science lab? Will the inheritance lawyers strike it rich? Watch it to find out!
- manoftheoldies
- Mar 25, 2014
- Permalink
- barrymillernola
- Apr 2, 2025
- Permalink
Too many reviewers are taking this movie way too seriously. The movie was made in the 43-44 time frame, military personnel were not that interested in deep plots, they wanted women. Joan was beautiful, every guys dream girl, they were looking at her legs, not intellectual prowess. I'd say the movie pulls this off by having a light nonsensical theme which doesn't force any kind of intellectual contemplation. It's important to remember that families of service members spent every day fearing the mail man and the knock on the door, all front line military personnel lived with the threat of death daily.
- jimaerojet
- Dec 13, 2024
- Permalink