User reviews

'Call Of Duty: WWII (2017)' is basically a blockbuster, a Michael Bay movie in video-game form. Almost every level contains a preposterously destructive set-piece and an absurd amount of gunfire, with the overall narrative generically playing into the typical war-time themes of 'brotherhood' and 'sacrifice'. There are moments in which the thing attempts to convey the horrors of war, but it typically just uses its setting as an excuse for its action (which is borderline problematic but so ingrained in pop culture that it's not really worth exploring here). A lot of this action is told via in-game cut-scenes and quick-time events, which wrench control away from you far too often than you'd like. It's essentially a corridor shooter in which you move from tightly defined checkpoint to tightly defined checkpoint, taking out enemies along the way and performing contextual actions when required. None of this means that the game isn't a lot of fun, though. First off, it looks fantastic. Its in-game graphics are almost as good as its pre-rendered stuff, realistically portraying its skirmishes and soldiers right the way through. Those soldiers are portrayed by a variety of actors, a few of whom are properly famous. They feel remarkably consistent across the predefined cut-scenes and in-the-moment gameplay, without a noticeable 'actor to AI' transition. They also add a lot to the story, which is trope-laden and, frankly, a little mundane. It does the job, though, and provokes more of an emotional response than previous entries in the 'Call Of Duty' series (just don't expect 'The Last Of Us (2013)'). Secondly, the gameplay is tight and refined. The shooting feels satisfying and there's plenty of it. Each level sees you take on foes in a new location as you push further into Nazi-occupied Germany. Occasionally, the gameplay shifts for a set-piece or two. For example, there's a segment in a tank and a segment in a plane. The best of these, however, is a portion in which you take on the role of an undercover spy and must recall details of your cover story to progress undetected. This takes place in what's probably the game's best level and it adds a much needed layer of tension to proceedings. Having said that, the firefights can be quite tense, too. That's especially true on veteran difficulty, which will see you picking your shots from a well-picked hiding spot and relying on your AI buddies' abilities for health kits and ammo. In the end, the campaign is a lot of fun. It isn't revolutionary and it isn't exactly deep, but it does its job and does it well enough to be worth playing. The multiplayer takes a cue from 'Battlefield 1 (2016)', with larger map and multi-phase modes. I haven't played enough of it to give a comprehensive overview but it's enjoyable and fast-paced. If you typically like the series' multiplayer, you'll like this. The same is true of the zombies mode, which provides an interesting and aesthetically unique challenge. Again, though, I haven't played enough of it to fully understand its nuances. This review is mainly concerning the campaign, which I've finished on veteran. To me, it's surprisingly enjoyable. It's not perfect and it won't change your life, but it's entertaining and well-produced throughout. 8/10

This is the first video game campaign in over a year that I have absolutely loved. Last one I loved was battlefield 1. It was absolutely incredible. It brought back the nostalgia of CoD 3, and CoD 4 with the theme, and emotion. And I mean this when I say this, the last CoD game that I actually enjoyed, was MW2. Everything after that I played, and honestly wasn't a big fan. This reignited the love I had for CoD. The graphics were SUCH a jump from infinite warfare, and the cut scenes were absolutely incredible. I could seriously watch a movie if just the cut scenes. Also, haven't been teary eyed over a game since battlefield 1. I literally just made an account on IMDB just to post this because of how impressed I was with Activision and the game, and how passionate it made me feel. PLAY IT. IT IS NOT JUST FOR THE MULTIPLAYER. Speaking of which, multiplayer is alright! Not to big on multiplayer though. I love the stories.

It's a bit of a short review but the multiplayer is your typical cod multiplayer, the zombies was alright in my opinion, and the campaign was actually really good. The cutscenes look phenomenal!

It so fun and feel like you in the movie like band of brothers one of my favorite documentaries it fun I definitely recommend it.

Realistic graphics .... Story.... Castings .. everything well done by the provider...

One of the best WW2 video games I have ever played!!!

Call of Duty: WW2 - A Visually Stunning Yet Familiar Journey

Call of Duty: WW2 is a nostalgic return to the series' roots, offering a visually stunning experience with an engaging narrative set in the grim reality of World War II. Developed by Sledgehammer Games, this installment brings the war to life with remarkable graphics and incredibly realistic cinematics that are among the best in the series.

Graphics and Cinematics

The visuals are impressive for their time, with detailed environments and character models that truly immerse you in the era. The cinematics, in particular, are astonishingly realistic, pulling you deeper into the narrative with each cutscene. However, some of the action sequences, like the constant near-death escapes and over-the-top rolling from explosions, can feel a bit exaggerated and detract from the overall realism.

The story follows Ronald "Red" Daniels and his squad-Pierson, Zussman, Stiles, Turner-through iconic battles of the Second World War. The narrative is well-paced, becoming increasingly engaging as you progress. While the plot sticks to the expected themes of sacrifice and brotherhood, it's executed well enough to remain compelling throughout. The voice acting and character development are solid, making you care about the team's fate.

Gameplay and Sound Design

The sound design, including the music and effects, is sufficient to complement the action and atmosphere. The gunplay, however, feels a bit lacking, especially for players accustomed to the more realistic weapon handling in games like Battlefield. The weapons in WW2 retain the classic Call of Duty feel, which can sometimes feel less immersive and more arcade-like. Despite this, the campaign offers a satisfying length, although some frustrating moments-like sudden rocket deaths-might test your patience.

Innovative Mission Design

In contrast to the typical "run and gun" gameplay, WW2 frequently mixes things up with varied mission designs. From stealth operations to large-scale assaults, each mission feels distinct, ensuring that the campaign never becomes monotonous. This variety not only keeps the gameplay fresh but also reinforces the narrative's focus on the different facets of war, from strategic planning to chaotic front-line combat. However, not all the variety works perfectly-the tank gameplay, for instance, feels unnecessarily challenging. The controls are cumbersome, and the experience can be frustratingly difficult, detracting from the overall enjoyment of the mission.

A Satisfying Conclusion

The journey through Call of Duty: WW2 culminates in a powerful and fitting conclusion. The ending ties together the emotional and narrative threads in a way that feels both satisfying and reflective of the game's themes. It leaves a lasting impression, providing a sense of closure that is both impactful and memorable.

Final Thoughts

Call of Duty: WW2 is more than just a shooter-it's a sobering reminder of the cost of war. By intertwining intense action with a narrative that doesn't shy away from the darker aspects of history, it offers a compelling and, at times, unsettling look at World War II. For those seeking a game that balances entertainment with a thoughtful exploration of its subject matter, this installment is a must-play.

Beautiful graphics and amazing guns, this game story ok, but I am glad they made a ww2. I thought They were never going to make a sequel of one of the best COD. Zombies are pretty fun too, with random terrifying looks. New zombies yes! This is ok call of duty but it will never replace b o 1. I want to give it a 7 but the zombies are out of this world!

The campaign is actually my favorite in all of the CoD's I've played (most of them). It is so well done, fun, and intense which really well creates and builds on the bonds between members of your squad. I adore this story. The multiplayer however was relatively weak, and it's easier to notice the game's laziness in depicting firearms, plus the cosmetics were weird and the multiplayer hub was an interesting experiment but one I'm glad got just the one chance. Being CoD, the multiplayer isn't bad enough to drag the ratings down, but it the difference in quality between its multiplayer and the campaign is staggering.

Call of duty ww2 is one of the best game in 2017 .After COD infinite warfare not hit they came back with old ideas with modern techniques in the game and they broadcasting Franklin D.Roosevelt voice in intro with background music also good...GREAT AND SHORT STORY... NO BORING while playing campaign..

I love Call of Duty World War 2! It was really awesome to see Call of Duty return to its origins! The story was a great story about war is hell, don't ever commit murder, treat your brothers in arms with respect, and really take care of your family and friends. The instrumental music was really good. The attention to detail with making the maps and scenery really look like the 1940s looked beautiful and great. The campaign was realistic and fun. The offline and online multiplayer was super fun. I thought the zombies survival mode felt too hard but the map was cool. The corrections I'd make is I wish there was less foul language, and I wish there was a way to turn off the gore. Still though I really enjoyed Call of Duty World War 2! Have a great day and goooo Call of Duty!

I love everything about World War 2, of its movies, mini series or video games, it was the best, the story telling, the characters, the acting, the graphics, everything was great! My only regret and the fact that I'm giving it a 9, is that it's too short!! I wanted moreeee!

I've played it twice now (on easy and hard) gonna play it again soon on Veteran.

Its actually a pretty fun shooter. The latest update made the game a lot smoother and better.

This is based purely on the story mode which is really good immursive and great to play

A shot em up style with a good band of brothers style story underneath makes this a good World war game.

I don't understand how you can make a game this awful in 2018. The formula for call of duty has been done to death; it wasn't nerfed or improved any in this game, the gameplay is stale & uninviting. Don't buy this game, don't buy any upcoming call of duty games until they improve.

Campaign: 9/10, incredibly underrated, stunning visuals, great main character, immersive gameplay.

Multiplayer: 6/10, gameplay is fine, map design could be better, way too many micro transactions.

I enjoy this game a lot, it's campaign is graphically stunning with some incredible action sequences. This game is let down by its average at best multiplayer. The micro transaction system is unnecessary and way too prevalent. The map design can be generic and the storyline in the campaign can at times feel overly linear and simple but for me, it doesn't detract my enjoyment too much. I'll give this an 8/10.

Amazing graphics, great story, great way to depict the setting, learned a few things I didn't knew about ww2, zombies mode is really good (contrary to common opinion) and this is coming from someone who believes that the best zombies experience comes from Black Ops 3.

This is one of my favorite Call of Duty at least in my top five single player campaigns in the franchise.

I enjoyed my time with the campaign for that is mostly because I was in the mood for a very scripted adventure through the second world war edit it disappoint and the story was good enough to make me a bit emotional attained when you finally got your man ****.

Graphics are insanely pretty even today the voice acting is good characters likeable and the weapons are fun to use even if sadly the shotgun is mostly ****'s just one of those Call of Duty games.

I keep returning to because sledgehammer games keep creating a very Earnest and honorable game every time they do it.

I never get the feeling that they are trying to be dark and itchy like other games in the series that are black ops.

I would really recommend this game if you're looking for a World War II shooter.

The gameplay isn't anything new, and it relies too much on the cutscenes. I couldn't do anything for like the first 15 to 20 minutes and when I did finally get control of my character they took it away again. It seems that it 1/3 actual gameplay, 2/3 cutscenes. If I wanted to watch a WWII show I would put on Band of Brothers. The weapons could be more accurate to their real-life counterparts, the sights, rates of fire, and handling are wrong for most of the weapons I used. Is it a good game? Yeah, when you are actually allowed to play.