Philip Pages’ Post

View profile for Philip Pages

CEO @ Redux Payments | Exited Founder | Turning failed payments into profit

I talked with 13 founders ranging from $2m/yr up to $90m/yr and they are all worried about the same thing: Rising customer acquisition costs (CAC). Unfortunately, the numbers don’t lie. Since 2014, CACs have skyrocketed by 222%. Whether you like it or not, this is the reality you need to overcome in 2025:   - It’s 4-5x more expensive to acquire new customers than retain existing ones - Marketing costs continue to climb in competitive digital spaces - Traditional advertising channels showing diminishing returns - Increased competition driving up bid costs on digital platforms How are these founders battling against rising CACs? The name of the game here is retention. Specifically around increasing lifetime value (LTV) by solving involuntary churn caused by failed payments. When a payment fails and leads to customer churn, companies face: 1) Lost immediate revenue from the failed payment 2) Lost future revenue from that customer's lifetime value 3) Additional marketing spend needed to replace the lost customer 4) Higher overall CAC due to constant replacement of churned customers Example: A customer with $150 monthly subscription churns after a failed payment: Normal LTV of 12 months  12 months * $150 = $1,800 in lost revenue (for a single customer) The founders I talked to are focusing on failed payment recovery because: 1) It preserves existing customer relationships 2) It maintains steady revenue streams 3) It reduces pressure on acquisition spending 4) It improves overall customer lifetime value 5) It allows marketing budgets to focus on growth rather than replacement This is a key area where these founders think differently: They know chasing new customers while bleeding existing ones through failed payments is like trying to fill a bucket with a hole in it. Here's the flywheel they understand that others miss: 1) Every saved customer is one you don't need to replace 2) Lower replacement costs = more money for actual growth 3) More money for growth = ability to outspend competition 4) Ability to outspend = faster growth 5) Back to step 1 While others are throwing money at rising CAC, they're focused on plugging the leaks first. And it’s working for them. Investing in payment recovery typically delivers: - Improved LTV:CAC ratios - 5-10%+ increase in top-line ARR - Compounding growth month over month The truth is, acquisition costs aren't going down anytime soon. Businesses that invest in failed payment recovery are going to be able to outcompete those that only focus on acquisition. Because in today's hyper competitive landscape, letting perfectly good customers slip away due to failed payments isn't just leaving money on the table... It's actively sabotaging your growth.

Marc Smookler

Managing Partner @ Phoenix.co | Turning Ideas into Market Leaders with My 80/20 Rule

4mo

Amazing post. I can already see how businesses that focus on payment recovery are going to be in a much better position than those just chasing new customers.

Jacob Boggess

💰Aspiring to be the Taylor Swift of Payments💰| Let's make payments fun 💳 | Most likely highly caffeinated ☕️⚡️

4mo

CAC + LTV are so critical. I hear this conversation multiple times a week in trying to maintain these metrics

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics