\contriblanguage

1 \contribtype1 \thematicarea7 \contact[email protected] 11institutetext: Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, CONICET–UBA, Argentina 22institutetext: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina

The rise and fall of radio-luminous merger shocks
from a large sample of galaxy cluster simulations

S.E. Nuza 1122
(…; …)

La generación de ondas de choque es una consecuencia natural del proceso jerárquico de formación de estructura. Con el tiempo, las estructuras cósmicas crecen en masa y tamaño mediante fusiones y a través de la acreción continua de material en los pozos de potencial de los halos de materia oscura. En particular, algunos cúmulos galácticos dinámicamente perturbados exhiben radio estructuras no térmicas conocidas como radio relics, que se cree están ligadas a choques de fusión en diferentes etapas de evolución. Estas ondas de choque brillan como resultado de la aceleración de electrones relativistas en presencia de campos magnéticos. En esta contribución, se analiza una muestra de re-simulaciones hidrodinámicas de cúmulos galácticos en un contexto cosmológico pertenecientes al proyecto The Three Hundred Project con el fin de estudiar la evolución de los relics en función de la masa cumular y el corrimiento al rojo. Esta muestra sintética nos permite calcular en detalle la radio luminosidad de los choques durante fusiones de cúmulos galácticos desde su generación al comienzo de la fusión hasta su desaparición.

Abstract

The generation of merger shocks is a natural outcome of the hierarchical process of structure formation. As time elapses cosmic structures grow in mass and size via mergers and through the continuous accretion of material onto the potential wells of dark matter haloes. In particular, some dynamically-perturbed galaxy clusters exhibit spectacular non-thermal radio features known as radio relics that are believed to trace cluster merger shocks at different stages of evolution. These radio shocks are thought to be illuminated by the acceleration of cosmic ray electrons in the presence of intracluster magnetic fields. In this contribution, we analyse a large sample of hydrodynamical, cosmological re-simulations of merging galaxy clusters belonging to The Three Hundred Project to study the median evolution of radio relics as a function of cluster mass and redshift. This synthetic cluster merger sample enables us to compute in detail the luminosity output of radio shocks from their onset at core passage to demise.

keywords:
galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium — shock waves — radiation mechanisms: non-thermal

1 Introduction

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Left-hand panel: Mass distribution of the most massive progenitor, M200,1subscript𝑀2001M_{200,1}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, in our galaxy cluster merger sample for 3 different redshift bins. Right-hand panel: Idem for the secondary progenitor mass, M200,2subscript𝑀2002M_{200,2}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Dashed vertical lines in both panels indicate the median mass value of each histogram.

In a hierarchical formation scenario of cosmic structures large dark matter haloes grow as a result of accretion and mergers with other systems. In this context, shock waves are naturally produced during halo assembly in a wide range of scales. In particular, galaxy clusters are believed to experience a series of major mergers during their lifetime, leading to the formation of merger shock waves which are ideal sites for (re)acceleration of cosmic ray electrons (CRe). In the presence of intracluster magnetic fields, these CRe produce non-thermal radio emission that trace large-scale shock waves in the outskirts of galaxy clusters. These so-called radio relics are preferentially observed in dynamically-perturbed systems showing clear signs of interaction (e.g., Nuza et al., 2012).

Previous studies on the modelling of radio relic populations from samples of simulated galaxy clusters according to the current formation scenario (e.g., Hoeft et al., 2011) focused, for instance, on their occurrence as a function of cluster mass and redshift (Nuza et al., 2012), scaling relations (Nuza et al., 2012, 2017; Lee et al., 2024), polarization structure (Wittor et al., 2019) and spectral properties (Wittor et al., 2021). These radio relic samples are typically built for a limited number of snapshots drawn from large cosmological simulation volumes, thus limiting the study of the evolution of radio relic properties at high-temporal resolution.

Recently, Nuza (2023) benefited from the larger temporal sampling of a galaxy cluster re-simulation belonging to the so-called Three Hundred Project (Cui et al., 2018) to build radio relic light curves, computing, for the first time, the expected output of non-thermal radio emission obtained from galaxy cluster mergers during the complete simulated cosmic evolution. A follow-up paper by Nuza et al. (2024) expanded this study to a sample of several hundred cluster regions estimating average trends for a large sample of groups and clusters focusing on radio luminosity light curves and radio relic power and cluster mass relations.

In this contribution, we further explore on several aspects concerning the behaviour of average radio relic light curves during the approach and merging phase of colliding systems characterised by two main structures extracted from the galaxy cluster sample of Nuza et al. (2024), focusing on the time evolution of the expected radio power. In particular, we concentrate on cluster mass, redshift distribution and initial configuration of the sample and the radio luminosity output from merger shocks in galaxy groups and clusters according to our modelling of non-thermal radiation.

This proceeding is organised as follows. In Sect. 2 we discuss the galaxy cluster merger sample used in this work. In Sect. 3 we briefly describe the non-thermal radio emission model and the shock finder in the simulations. In Sect. 4 we discuss our results. Finally, in Sect. 5 we present the conclusions.

2 Galaxy cluster merger catalogue

In this work, we used a sample of galaxy cluster regions that belongs to the Three Hundred Project, a suite of 324 spherical zoom-in re-simulations of galaxy cluster regions of radius 15h115superscript115\,h^{-1}\,15 italic_h start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTMpc extracted from the 1h31superscript31\,h^{-3}\,1 italic_h start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 3 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTGpc3 MDPL2 MultiDark simulation (Klypin et al., 2016), where hhitalic_h is the reduced Hubble constant. The cosmological model adopted is consistent with the Planck 2015 cosmology (Planck Collaboration et al., 2016). Galaxy cluster regions were re-simulated with the Gadget-X code (e.g., Beck et al., 2016) including full hydrodynamics, metal-dependent gas cooling, an UV background radiation field, and other relevant sub-grid astrophysical processes such as star formation, feedback from supernovae/active galactic nuclei and black hole growth. Mass resolution at the beginning of each re-simulation is 1.27×109h11.27superscript109superscript11.27\times 10^{9}\,h^{-1}\,1.27 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 9 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_h start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTM and 2.36×108h12.36superscript108superscript12.36\times 10^{8}\,h^{-1}\,2.36 × 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_h start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTM, for dark matter and gas particles, respectively.

From the simulated cluster regions, we built a catalogue of mergers displaying a significant mass increase of ΔM/M0.5Δ𝑀𝑀0.5\Delta M/M\geq 0.5roman_Δ italic_M / italic_M ≥ 0.5 within a time interval equal to the cluster dynamical time or less (Contreras-Santos et al., 2022). Despite the great variety of astrophysical situations possible during galaxy cluster mergers (sometimes involving more than two objects), here we simply characterise mergers by accounting for the two main merging systems. We note that the particular mass fraction increase chosen guarantees that our merger sample mainly corresponds to major mergers, i.e. μM200,2/M200,10.3𝜇subscript𝑀2002subscript𝑀2001greater-than-or-equivalent-to0.3\mu\equiv M_{200,2}/M_{200,1}\gtrsim 0.3italic_μ ≡ italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≳ 0.3, with M200,1subscript𝑀2001M_{200,1}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and M200,2subscript𝑀2002M_{200,2}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT the mass of the main and secondary clusters, respectively. As a result, we end up with a sample of 555 well-resolved mergers with M200,11013subscript𝑀2001superscript1013M_{200,1}\geq 10^{13}\,italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≥ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTM within R200,1subscript𝑅2001R_{200,1}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, i.e. the main progenitor’s radius enclosing an overdensity of 200 times the critical density of the Universe.

2.1 Cluster merger sub-samples

Additionally, we split the merger catalogue into different sub-samples. In this way, we are able to study the impact of cluster mass and redshift of the merging systems in the final radio light curves. First, we select i) merging groups for systems satisfying 1013M200,1/M<1014superscript1013subscript𝑀2001subscriptMdirect-productsuperscript101410^{13}\leq M_{200,1}/\mathrm{M}_{\odot}<10^{14}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and ii) merging clusters with M200,11014Msubscript𝑀2001superscript1014subscriptMdirect-productM_{200,1}\geq 10^{14}\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≥ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Given that most of the collisions in our catalogue correspond to major mergers, this choice ensures that main and secondary masses are of the same order, thus naturally separating the sample into less/more massive mergers. Second, we also built additional sub-samples selecting systems by merger redshift instead of cluster mass. The redshift of each merger in our catalogue is computed as the mean value between the redshifts corresponding to tstartsubscript𝑡startt_{\rm start}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_start end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and tendsubscript𝑡endt_{\rm end}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_end end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the start and end times of each merger (see the discussion in Contreras-Santos et al., 2022). Specifically, we also take iii) early and iv) late merger samples by imposing the conditions zz𝑧superscript𝑧z\geq z^{\prime}italic_z ≥ italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and z<z𝑧superscript𝑧z<z^{\prime}italic_z < italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, respectively. To assess the evolution of merging systems across the whole cosmic history, we simply take z=1superscript𝑧1z^{\prime}=1italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 1 as most of the less massive clusters in our sample lie above this value (see Fig. 1).

3 The radio output from shocks

The radio emission produced in structure formation shocks is computed following Nuza et al. (2017). In this model, a fixed fraction of thermal electrons get accelerated at the shock fronts acquiring an energy distribution consistent with the diffusive shock acceleration (DSA) scenario. The resulting CRe are then advected by the downstream plasma, where they experience radiative losses, primarily through synchrotron radiation and inverse Compton scattering with cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons. The non-thermal emission behind the shock is obtained by integrating the electron distribution along the downstream region assuming a constant shock velocity, which can be related to the sonic Mach number, \mathcal{M}caligraphic_M. Then, the radio power, Pν,Asubscript𝑃𝜈𝐴P_{\nu,A}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν , italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, per unit frequency, ν𝜈\nuitalic_ν, and area, A𝐴Aitalic_A, for each gas particle scales as

Pν,Aneνs2Td32Bd1+s2(BCMB2+Bd2)1Ψ(),proportional-tosubscript𝑃𝜈𝐴subscript𝑛esuperscript𝜈𝑠2superscriptsubscript𝑇d32superscriptsubscript𝐵d1𝑠2superscriptsuperscriptsubscript𝐵CMB2superscriptsubscript𝐵d21ΨP_{\nu,A}\propto n_{\rm e}\,\nu^{-\frac{s}{2}}\,T_{\rm d}^{\frac{3}{2}}B_{\rm d% }^{1+\frac{s}{2}}\left(B_{\rm CMB}^{2}+B_{\rm d}^{2}\right)^{-1}\,\Psi({\cal M% }){\rm,}italic_P start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν , italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∝ italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_ν start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - divide start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT divide start_ARG 3 end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 + divide start_ARG italic_s end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_CMB end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_Ψ ( caligraphic_M ) , (1)
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Median value of the cosine of the angle between the relative position and velocity vectors of the two main progenitors in the cluster sample as a function of main progenitor mass computed at the starting redshift of the merger (see Sect. 4.1). Horizontal error bars indicate the standard deviation in each bin, whereas vertical error bars stand for the 25252525th and 75757575th percentiles.

where nesubscript𝑛en_{\rm e}italic_n start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_e end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the electron density, s𝑠sitalic_s is the slope of electron energy distribution given by DSA, Tdsubscript𝑇dT_{\rm d}italic_T start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the post-shock temperature, Bdsubscript𝐵dB_{\rm d}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_d end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the post-shock magnetic field, BCMBsubscript𝐵CMBB_{\rm CMB}italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_CMB end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the magnetic measure of the CMB energy density, and Ψ()Ψ\Psi(\cal M)roman_Ψ ( caligraphic_M ) depends on the shock strength strongly suppressing radio emission for 2less-than-or-similar-to2\mathcal{M}\lesssim 2caligraphic_M ≲ 2.

Magnetic fields are assumed to scale with local electron density following a profile consistent with observations of the Coma cluster (Dolag et al., 2001; Bonafede et al., 2010). Shock fronts in the simulations are identified from gas particles fulfilling a set of criteria such as convergent flows and entropy/density jumps and the Mach number is computed using the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions (Landau & Lifshitz, 1959). Further details on the non-thermal radio model and the shock finder can be found in Nuza et al. (2017) and references therein.

4 Results

4.1 Cluster mass distribution and merger orbits

Figure 1 shows the distribution of the progenitor masses during galaxy cluster mergers in our sample for 3 different redshift bins for the complete merger catalogue. In particular, the merger ratio, μ=M~200,2/M~200,1superscript𝜇subscript~𝑀2002subscript~𝑀2001\mu^{\prime}=\tilde{M}_{200,2}/\tilde{M}_{200,1}italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = over~ start_ARG italic_M end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / over~ start_ARG italic_M end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, of the median cluster mass values, for all redshift intervals is μ0.6greater-than-or-equivalent-tosuperscript𝜇0.6\mu^{\prime}\gtrsim 0.6italic_μ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≳ 0.6 demonstrating that many of the two main merging structures in our cluster merger sample are similar. Additionally, there is a clear trend of progenitor masses with redshift, where the less (more) massive systems are located at larger (smaller) redshifts. Specifically, the most massive galaxy clusters in the sample are formed at redshifts z0.5𝑧0.5z\leq 0.5italic_z ≤ 0.5, reaching masses similar to that of massive local clusters in agreement with observations. This is a natural consequence of the hierarchical nature of structure formation where the most massive systems form as a result of the coalescence of less massive objects.

The normalised projection of the relative velocity of the two main merger progenitors onto the direction of the radial vector between them, cosθrelsubscript𝜃rel\cos\theta_{\rm rel}roman_cos italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rel end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, is shown in Fig. 2 as a function of main progenitor mass. Here, θrelsubscript𝜃rel\theta_{\rm rel}italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rel end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the relative angle between the two vectors computed at the start time of the cluster merger according to the time definition of Contreras-Santos et al. (2022). This quantity provides an indication on the nature of the orbit followed by the two merging structures with cosθrel=1subscript𝜃rel1\cos\theta_{\rm rel}=-1roman_cos italic_θ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_rel end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 1 corresponding to a purely radial orbit. As seen in Fig. 2, the vast majority of systems in our catalogue, from galaxy groups to clusters, show fairly radial orbits at the beginning of the interaction, which translates into typical impact parameters of about a few hundred kpc at core passage. This is expected as colliding structures within a cosmological context usually come from preferred directions determined by large-scale cosmic filaments connected to the central clusters. This trend, however, is slightly less pronounced for the less massive clusters, which are more likely to experience perturbations at an early stage of the merger phase.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Median radio light curve evolution at 1.41.41.4\,1.4GHz during galaxy cluster collisions after subtraction of the linear baseline (see Sect. 4.2) as a function of time with respect to the core passage for the merger sub-samples introduced in Sect. 2.1: i) group (1013M200,1/M<1014superscript1013subscript𝑀2001subscriptMdirect-productsuperscript101410^{13}\leq M_{200,1}/\mathrm{M}_{\odot}<10^{14}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 13 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / roman_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊙ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT); ii) cluster (M200,11014subscript𝑀2001superscript1014M_{200,1}\geq 10^{14}\,italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≥ 10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 14 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPTM); iii) early (z1𝑧1z\geq 1italic_z ≥ 1), and iv) late (z<1𝑧1z<1italic_z < 1) mergers. Dashed lines correspond to best-fitting exponential functions of the cluster and group sub-samples for times before and after the peak of each light curve.

4.2 Radio luminosity evolution from an ensemble of galaxy cluster mergers

To study the average radio luminosity output produced during cluster mergers, we followed previous works and computed all radio emission at 1.41.41.4\,1.4GHz produced by shocks in our galaxy cluster catalogue within a distance of R200,1(t)subscript𝑅2001𝑡R_{200,1}(t)italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 200 , 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) from the main cluster’s centre according to the non-thermal model introduced in Sect. 3 during the complete merger evolution. This distance is adequate to encompass the temporal evolution of merger radio shocks, from their onset to demise, without including too much radiation produced in external shocks. As a result, we obtained a sample of radio light curves that can be combined taking into account the core-passage time, tcpsubscript𝑡cpt_{\rm cp}italic_t start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_cp end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, of each system. This parameter was estimated assessing the relative distance and velocity of the two most massive progenitors during the collisions. In this way, it is possible to estimate the median radio luminosity light curve of cluster mergers as a function of cluster mass and redshift.

The median radio relic luminosity during cluster mergers from simulation data is described with the following expression:

P~1.4(t)=G~1.4(t)+l~1.4(t),subscript~𝑃1.4𝑡subscript~𝐺1.4𝑡subscript~𝑙1.4𝑡\tilde{P}_{1.4}(t)=\tilde{G}_{1.4}(t)+\tilde{l}_{1.4}(t){\rm,}over~ start_ARG italic_P end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1.4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) = over~ start_ARG italic_G end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1.4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) + over~ start_ARG italic_l end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1.4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) , (2)

where G~1.4(t)subscript~𝐺1.4𝑡\tilde{G}_{1.4}(t)over~ start_ARG italic_G end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1.4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) is a skewed Gaussian function chosen to reproduce the radio luminosity evolution and l~1.4(t)subscript~𝑙1.4𝑡\tilde{l}_{1.4}(t)over~ start_ARG italic_l end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1.4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ) is a linear baseline to mimic the cumulative effect of spurious radiation (i.e., not related to the merger shocks) that may be produced within the cluster volume.

Figure 3 shows the median radio light curve as a function of time with respect to the core passage after subtraction of the linear function, l~1.4(t)subscript~𝑙1.4𝑡\tilde{l}_{1.4}(t)over~ start_ARG italic_l end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1.4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_t ), for the 4 merger sub-samples defined in Sect. 2.1. In general, a strong increase of the radio luminosity output can be seen for all curves after core passage in a period of about several hundred Myr. This is highlighted by the exponential fits shown as dashed lines during the radio growth phase. In particular, the most massive mergers belonging to the cluster sub-sample (blue solid line) can boost the radio shock emission up to about 2similar-toabsent2\sim 2∼ 2 orders of magnitude during the growth phase. Similarly, the late sub-sample (orange solid line) shows a similar evolution as most of the massive systems are typically assembled at lower redshifts. After the emission peak, in all cases, radio emission decays in somewhat longer timescales as a result of skewness of the light curves. Smaller mass mergers are represented by the group (green solid line) and early (red solid line) sub-samples which present a similar evolution, albeit reaching much lower radio luminosity peaks. Although the radio growth phase in these two sub-samples is comparable, the decay phase after the peak is less pronounced in the early sub-sample, most likely owing to the inclusion of highly-perturbed, lower-mass systems at high redshift. In total, radio shocks in our sub-samples require 1.21.6similar-toabsent1.21.6\sim 1.2–1.6\,∼ 1.2 – 1.6Gyr to recover luminosities matching core passage levels.

5 Conclusions

In this work, we made use of the large temporal sampling of an ensemble of galaxy cluster re-simulations from The Three Hundred Project to study the radio luminosity output of merger shocks during galaxy cluster collisions. Our catalogue comprises a total of 555 major mergers within a cosmological context primarily characterised by the two main colliding structures, although more complicated situations are not uncommon. In general, most of the massive mergers take place at lower redshifts in agreement with the hirarchical nature of the accepted structure formation scenario. The colliding systems start the merger phase in almost radial orbits with a small tangential velocity component that translates into impact parameters of about a few hundred kpc at core passage.

After splitting the merger catalogue into several sub-samples comprising less and more massive systems, we computed the median radio light curves of relics during galaxy cluster mergers to characterise the radio luminosity output from the onset of merger shocks, just before core passage, to demise after 1greater-than-or-equivalent-toabsent1\gtrsim 1\,≳ 1Gyr, moderately depending on cluster mass. We found that typical light curves rise abruptly after core passage until the emission peak is reached 500700similar-toabsent500700\sim 500-700\,∼ 500 - 700Myr after core passage. Overall, merger shocks represent the tip of the iceberg of the non-thermal radio Universe, primarily shaped by the highest galaxy density regions.

{acknowledgement}

S.E.N. is a member of the Carrera del Investigador Científico of CONICET. He acknowledges support from CONICET (PIBAA R73734), Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2021-GRF-TI-00290) and UBACyT (20020170100129BA).

References

  • Beck et al. (2016) Beck A.M., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2110
  • Bonafede et al. (2010) Bonafede A., et al., 2010, A&A, 513, A30
  • Contreras-Santos et al. (2022) Contreras-Santos A., et al., 2022, MNRAS, 511, 2897
  • Cui et al. (2018) Cui W., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 480, 2898
  • Dolag et al. (2001) Dolag K., et al., 2001, A&A, 378, 777
  • Hoeft et al. (2011) Hoeft M., et al., 2011, JApA, 32, 509
  • Klypin et al. (2016) Klypin A., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4340
  • Landau & Lifshitz (1959) Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M., 1959, Fluid mechanics
  • Lee et al. (2024) Lee W., et al., 2024, A&A, 686, A55
  • Nuza (2023) Nuza S.E., 2023, BAAA, 64, 166
  • Nuza et al. (2012) Nuza S.E., et al., 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2006
  • Nuza et al. (2017) Nuza S.E., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 470, 240
  • Nuza et al. (2024) Nuza S.E., et al., 2024, A&A, 690, A146
  • Planck Collaboration et al. (2016) Planck Collaboration, et al., 2016, A&A, 594, A13
  • Wittor et al. (2019) Wittor D., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3987
  • Wittor et al. (2021) Wittor D., et al., 2021, MNRAS, 506, 396