CAA co-chairman and Scarlett Johansson‘s agent Bryan Lourd issued a statement Friday in response to Disney’s harsh slam against the Black Widow actress in her breach of contact lawsuit versus the Burbank studio.
On Thursday, Disney shamed the two-time Oscar nominee by saying her lawsuit showed “callous disregard” for the pandemic — the latter of which has been the studio’s excuse for taking Black Widow day-and-date in theaters on and Disney+ Premier. Disney also outed her $20 million salary for the film, which it claims that coupled with the Disney+ monies of the MCU title “significantly enhanced her ability to earn additional compensation.”
Below is Lourd’s statement:
I want to address the Walt Disney Company’s statement that was issued in response to the lawsuit filed against them yesterday by our client Scarlett Johansson. They have shamelessly and falsely accused Ms. Johansson of being insensitive to the global COVID pandemic, in an attempt to make her appear to be someone they and I know she isn’t.
Scarlett has been Disney’s partner on nine movies, which have earned Disney and its shareholders billions. The company included her salary in their press statement in an attempt to weaponize her success as an artist and businesswoman, as if that were something she should be ashamed of. Scarlett is extremely proud of the work that she, and all of the actors, writers, directors, producers, and the Marvel creative team have been a part of for well over a decade.
This suit was filed as a result of Disney’s decision to knowingly violate Scarlett’s contract. They have very deliberately moved the revenue stream and profits to the Disney+ side of the company leaving artistic and financial partners out of their new equation. That’s it, pure and simple.
Disney’s direct attack on her character and all else they implied is beneath the company that many of us in the creative community have worked with successfully for decades.
Johansson’s breach of contract lawsuit (read it here) was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court yesterday and is the first public slam by a Hollywood star against a studio that’s reaping money by crushing theatrical windows at the expense of talent in exchange for spiking its stock price for the sake of its newfound streaming service. Disney’s stock price in the wake of Disney+ has hit a 52-week high of $203.02; shares are now trading at $176.90 at the time of this report.
In addition to CAA, Johansson is getting support from other celebrities, who pounced on media conglomerate for making an issue of her pay when its own executives are so highly compensated. Alex Baldwin tweeted, “Remarkable to read Disney execs bashing SJ over large salaries…”
The lawsuit also has drawn some attention even outside the entertainment industry. Andrew Yang, the former presidential candidate and former New York mayor hopeful, tweeted, “Scarlett Johansson suing Marvel is a terrible look for Disney. They really should renegotiate these deals as they didn’t reflect the company’s enormous shift to streaming. The thing is Disney still benefits from the shift but the talent doesn’t.”
He later added, “Disney does not want to be feuding with its talent in this way. Scarlett Johansson, Emma Stone and Emily Blunt are much more sympathetic to the public than the $300B Mouse House.”
The actress’ contract with Disney called for a wide theatrical release, much like other MCU movies. Reports have it that Johansson lost more than $50M in Disney’s dynamic window experiment, which yielded a first-weekend global PVOD and theatrical weekend for Black Widow of $218M. Black Widow will be lucky to hit $350M worldwide at the box office, a low gross for an MCU title, which typically churns out of late over $1 billion. The National Association of Theatre Owners slammed Disney during the pic’s second weekend for moving PVOD money forward. All of this means in the end that Black Widow will make less money in its total revenue life cycle. Universal’s F9, which has respected the theatrical window, looks to do double what Black Widow does at the global box office.
“It’s no secret that Disney is releasing films like Black Widow directly onto Disney+ to increase subscribers and thereby boost the company’s stock price – and that it’s hiding behind Covid-19 as a pretext to do so,” Johansson’s attorney, John Berlinski of Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, said in a statement Thursday. “But ignoring the contracts of the artists responsible for the success of its films in furtherance of this short-sighted strategy violates their rights and we look forward to proving as much in court. This will surely not be the last case where Hollywood talent stands up to Disney and makes it clear that, whatever the company may pretend, it has a legal obligation to honor its contracts.”
Those profiting off Black Widow the most per the lawsuit are Disney titans CEO Bob Chapek and executive chairman Bob Iger, who reaped big money tied to the success of Disney+.
“Disney’s financial disclosures make clear that the very Disney executives who orchestrated this strategy will personally benefit from their and Disney’s misconduct,” as it identifies Chapek’s equity grants “totaling 3.8 times his $2.5 million base salary” in 2021, with the “primary justification” for that award being the launch of direct-to-consumer services. The lawsuit also notes that Iger received the “overwhelming majority” of his $16.5 million compensation in the form of stock grants, with the company’s annual report citing the growth of Disney+.
Johansson has had starring credits in seven MCU movies that have amassed $10.3 billion at the global box office. Separately she had a voice-over role in Disney’s live-action version of The Jungle Book which grossed $966.6M WW, and their Searchlight acquired Oscar-nominated Jojo Rabbit which made $90.3M WW.
Ted Johnson contributed to this report.
Absent explicit “exclusive theatrical release” language in the contract, which seems to be disagreement between the sides about, it is going to be very difficult for Johansson’s side to argue that opening in more than 4,100 theaters was any sort of bad-faith support on part of Disney. That’s more theaters than Capt. Marvel opened in; it’s more theaters than F9 opened in. It might be the most theaters ever opened by a film.
That Disney opened the release even larger than those 4,100+ screens through other distrib. should be even better.
So she made $20-million and is complaining she didn’t make $50-million?
Disney should honor their contract, but celebrities need to realize that people are getting tired of them making so much money for almost no reason. They are talented people, but they earn insane amounts of money. And they live in ivory towers from which they make insensitive and tone deaf PSAs during COVID…from their ivory towers.
Now they complain because they get paid insane amounts of money as opposed to obscene amounts of money? These people lose all touch with reality.
I say we cancel them all. We don’t need them. Just make all the actors CGI already with AI voices. Tech won’t be really good for another 20 years, but let’s just go ahead and do it. It will happen anyway.
“Callous disregard for the pandemic”. Kind of like Bob Chapek collecting his $14m bonus that was “in his contract’ after laying off tens of thousands of employees, and the company losing billions. Seems fair and equal right?
Get rid of streaming for everyone everywhere. The only way consumers can spend their money or have any say about where they get their content will first be by the people who make it. Consumers lose but they and their industry win. Problem solved
No matter how ones try to explain it of have something against Disney..There is no denying the only thing seen here are millionaire complaining about their millions…