Austin Murphy

BluWave has a deep bench of 800+ interim CFOs that allow us to quickly and expertly connect private equity firms and their portfolio companies to the exact-fit interim CFOs they need.    In one case study example, a PE firm came to us in need of a stopgap interim CFO for their automotive operations portfolio company. Here's the details of how we helped:   The Situation - Needing to make a leadership change in their portfolio company, a PE firm came to us in urgent need of an interim CFO who could focus on the portco's cash flow and working capital optimization while the search for a permanent CFO was underway. Given the protfolio company's industry, the PE firm not only needed an interim CFO with financial acumen, but one with the ability to handle a complex operational landscape and turnaround skills.   How BluWave Helped - Thanks to BluWave's deep network of exact-fit interim CFOs, we quickly connected them with a select few interim CFOs with the exact experience they were looking for.    The Outcome - The client selected their preferred interim CFO from our presented options. Their leadership marked a significant turning point for the automotive manufacturer, helping them tighten cash flow, meet reporting requirements and guide them through a crucial transition period.   When you need an exact-fit, PE-grade interim CFO, contact BluWave and we'll be ready to support.   #interimCFO #interimchieffinancialofficer

26

1 Comment

The Information broke news that Insight Partners has just secured $10B in funding for their latest flagship fund. This is perfectly timed given their multiple $1B+ companies sold over the past week. This is a clear sight that #limitedpartners still have in their #privateallocations even during the current slow markets for #IPOs and #M&A. This would also appear to be good news for #AIfinancing and #SaaSFinancing. What do you think? #Management #VentureCapital #PrivateEquity #CapitalMarkets https://lnkd.in/gXu_s8Qj

2

1 Comment

May is when many private companies finalize mid-year comp plans 💵 Need a reliable 409A valuation? Or has it been over a year since your last? We've got you covered! Scalar's 409A valuations keep you compliant, protect employees from tax penalties, and come with a team that supports you all the way through an audit. https://lnkd.in/gs_CtPNS

9

Is Now the Best Time to Raise a Private Equity Fund? According to industry leaders, it just might be. "I’m much more optimistic at this point in the cycle in 2024 than I was in 2023 and 2022," says Andy Lund, global co-head of Houlihan Lokey's Private Funds Group. Despite expectations of a slowdown, the first half of 2024 has been unexpectedly successful for PE managers raising capital. U.S.-based funds closed on $155 billion by the end of June, slightly ahead of the first half of 2023 (PitchBook Q2 2024 US PE Breakdown). Alex Russ, head of North America for Evercore's Private Funds Group, sees this as an ideal moment for GPs with open funds. "We saw fewer new fundraise launches in 2024 than in 2022 and 2023, leading to a slight easing, which we expect to continue into the second half of this year," he notes. However, challenges remain. LP capital is still largely locked until M&A and exit activities resume. Evercore anticipates flat PE fundraising figures for 2024 compared to 2023. Moreover, other asset classes are vying for already limited institutional capital, with private credit showing particularly strong growth. In this context, Maria Konnikova’s "The Biggest Bluff" offers an insightful analogy. Inspired by "Theory of Games and Economic Behavior" by John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern, the book explores von Neumann's belief that poker epitomizes the delicate balance between skill and chance that governs life. Doing well at poker isn’t just about playing well; it’s about playing well relative to everyone else. And even with the best strategies, luck plays a critical role. As Nobel-winning economist Daniel Kahneman notes, "The successful funds in any given year are mostly lucky; they have a good roll of the dice. There is general agreement among researchers that nearly all stock pickers, whether they know it or not—and few of them do—are playing a game of chance." The last two years were like drawing a bad hand in poker for those raising funds. The book also emphasizes the importance of thinking like a Strategist—something I’ve honed throughout my career. Each move requires reassessment based on new information. You need a plan that evolves with feedback and supports long-term, good decision-making. If you’ve lost your chips, was it due to an unlucky situation—or because your strategy was flawed? A recurring mantra of Poker Hall of Famer Erik Seidel is "less certainty, more inquiry." If that becomes your guiding principle, not only will you actively listen, but you will also adapt and grow. For GPs, strengthening relationships with existing LPs is more crucial than ever. Now is the time to leverage your learnings and craft compelling narratives that showcase your commitment to value creation and strategic growth. By highlighting your firm's ability to navigate complex market dynamics, you can strengthen LP alignment and foster the partnerships needed for long-term success.

59

4 Comments

As the IPO window remains shut and other paths to liquidity (buyout and M&A) remain compressed, the Cerebras Systems S-1 filing is a cautious welcome sign for the venture capital asset class. As the first "pure play" generative AI company to go public since ChatGPT's release, this marks what could the beginning of a new technology IPO wave. The company is making the bold attempt to take NVIDIA head on: ✅ Cerebras has developed a novel wafer-scale AI chip that is 57x larger than a GPU with 7,000x the on-chip memory  📈 Revenue grew a an incredible 1,122% YoY to $70M in latest quarter 💰 Blue-chip technology investors including Benchmark, Coatue, and Altimeter But the S-1 filing also reveals some notable challenges and risks: 🚩 83% of revenue came from a single customer in 2023 🗳️ Possible CFIUS scrutiny over their relationship with an Emirati company 🧑‍💼 CEO named in prior SEC enforcement action in early 2000s We will continue to keep an eye out for more details in the coming months around IPO pricing and the company’s regulatory squabbles, but in the meantime, please enjoy the full essay below.

19

1 Comment

Q3 is out and Q4 is in!  This is a great read about Base10's strategic switch showcasing how Carta is simplifying fund administration for emerging managers, which is especially important now rolling into the year-end busy season. 

9

LP Tip #20 out of #50: To re-up or not to re-up A re-up refers to an LP making an additional investment in a fund where they previously invested. Before we dive in I want to share that there are reasons an LP may not to re-up which are not in your control. Here is a short list: ➡️ The LP may have evolved their strategy and needs to scale back the #️⃣ of funds they invested in.   ➡️ The LP was never set up to re-up in the first place. ➡️ The LP could be an individual that found themselves in a cash crunch and overly exposed to venture.  I'm assuming that when you got your investment that the LP explicitly told you they do re-ups. Please do not assume they do. My expectation is also that the LP dug in to properly underwrite the fund. 🏴 Re-ups are not automatic. An LP will have to re-underwrite each fund. The speed of the re-up also depends on how much work was done in the initial investment, who led the investment, level of confidence there existed when that investment was done, and current pipeline of funds. There are 4 flags that may cause an LP to walk away. 1️⃣ Partner Breakups/Changes and Team Turnover:  The biggest risk in Partnerships are whether the Partners will stay together. One LP gave me a framework on how to think through this issue that has stuck with me. Partnership is like a marriage. If one feels there is potential for a breakup, does one believe it will be an amicable breakup? Or, does one believe the spouses will never talk again? If it is an amicable split that is manageable. The Partners can find a way to support the fund. Then the question becomes whether the LP wants to back the Partner/s that remain.  If there is high team turnover. The LP will want to investigate because team stability is used as a proxy for firm sustainability and ability to scale. 2️⃣ Fund Does not Execute on what they Sold the LP:  The LP “bought” something specific and typically it is because they were missing this strategy or wanted exposure to a strategy for the portfolio they were constructing. An institutional LP will invest and write a detailed investment memo flagging all the things you said you were going to do and then go back and compare when you come back to ask for money. If for example you pitched a generalist seed stage fund and you show up asking for money sharing that you invested in deeptech at A that will cause alarm. The same can be said for the number of companies you promised to invest in or check sizes you wrote. If there are big differences LPs will want to know why. 3️⃣ Bad Actions  The fund manager/s does something that is unethical. This is a no go for an LP.  What if the situation is not clearcut? This is different for everyone and requires discussions b/w GP and LP, but most LPs don't want headline risk. 4️⃣ Continuous Underperformance  If it's early days an LP will look at some key indicators to see how you are progressing over time.

17

This FT article has a fancy graphic illustrating the layers of debt in private equity, but -- despite my prior post warning about the risks of debt layering in PE -- this article is inaccurate scaremongering. Here’s the key line: “Much of this lending is ultimately underpinned by the financial health of a fund’s portfolio companies. Yet every transaction ends up adding more leverage to heavily indebted businesses, which can make them more vulnerable in a downturn.” This statement is fundamentally incorrect. From the leverage used by General Partners or Limited Partners on their overall private equity portfolios to the use of subscription lines, secondary fund leverage, and leverage by funds purchasing GP stakes—none of these add leverage to the individual businesses or increase their susceptibility to economic downturns. The only mechanism that does add leverage to a business is a dividend recapitalization. However, the alternative is typically the PE firm selling the business to realize its investment, where the acquirer, especially if it’s another PE firm, would likely employ the same amount of leverage. Net Asset Value (NAV) loans may represent leverage on leverage from an LP’s perspective, but they do not increase the portfolio company’s debt or its bankruptcy risk during a downturn. Instead, they merely increase the possibility that the GP might need to sell sooner than desired to repay fund-level debt. Therefore, the only factor impacting a portfolio company’s failure probability is dividend recapitalization. The bank’s expertise is to assess the risk of its debt investment in the company. Whether a GP sells a stake in their management company, an LP sells a stake to a secondary fund, or the fund uses a subscription loan (a short-term loan backed by LP capital commitments to optimize investment IRR by delaying capital calls) to purchase the company—none of these scenarios affect the portfolio company’s ability to weather a downturn. “There should not be a pocket of the market that touches on so much of the economy in such a sizeable way, where we can say, ‘oh there’s leverage,’ and then very few of us can explain what that leverage means and why it might—or might not—be risky,” said Victoria Ivashina, a professor at Harvard Business School specializing in private capital. I can only assume Professor Victoria Ivashina was either unaware of the article’s specifics or, as a private markets expert, she is 'one of a few' (?) who could have alleviated the author’s concerns about this ‘web of debt.’ Moreover, where is the causality here? There is no indication (other than the title of the article) that PE firms are coercing banks into making these loans. The title could just as easily have been “How Banks Have Mired PE Shops in Potentially Depression-Inducing Debt.” Both parties willingly engage in these transactions, and as new debt products emerge, banks are as proactive in marketing them to PE firms as the firms are in seeking them out.

3

Dan Primack of Axios has some choice words for VCs in this post. If you are an investor, LP or a founder raising money from VCs - worth the read. I tend to agree with Dan here and have some thoughts... 1) Private Equity is an ecosystem that relies on flow not a one-way transfer of assets. VC is semi-broken right now because no one wants to sell off a portfolio below performance targets. Could mean game over for the GPs. Seems like public, private and venture are all trying to remain optimistic while waiting for a drop in interest rates and an uptick in IPOs or PE buyouts to start the liquidity flow again but Fed and inflation data keep frustrating this kicking off. 2) VC have one core job as far as LPs are concerned....Create a magic black box that is a cash multiplier. Not a black hole! When and how early investments become liquid need to change also. 3) We have an 80 year old VC fund model that requires wild, best-case scenario power-law returns to generate the performance numbers the asset class promises to investors. This handcuffs GPs to staying in deals for a very long time as the early exits or lower deal multiples can drag funds performance and then their job security, fee structure, etc as I alluded to above. This also drives companies to "go big or go home" and operate with inherently more risk than stability. 4) Dan talks about the need for liquidity and to get back to the money flow. This is easier said than done as a minority investor. Incrementally easier if you and your co-investors are able to steer the company at the board level but its still "not your company" and the "market is the market" re comps/multiples and demand. 5) So - what can we, as an industry, do about this? We have to evolve. We have to have some hard conversations around the table and not let staid endowment funds and Goldman Sachs dictate how our industry looks at the future...feel like this becomes a new post or a series so I'll leave it here for now. #venture #VC #startups #privatequity

36

1 Comment

In a new op-ed I penned for Institutional Investor, I discuss the changing strategic buyer landscape for enterprise software companies. With software continuing to grow well in excess of GDP, and digital transformation at the top of C-suites’ agendas, the trend of multi-billion dollar software companies being acquired by non-traditional buyers should continue to accelerate. As always, all comments are welcome!

440

12 Comments

🔎 A graph every VC manager should be following right now. PE's exit to investment ratio has hit a ten year low Most LPs invest a multiple of their VC allocation in PE. The less liquidity coming from larger buckets, the less divestments that can be made into the asset class 🔮 Similarly if this starts picking up, the allocation doors could start to re-open... #VC #venturecapital

168

12 Comments

What do you do when growth isn’t an option? This is the reality PE Sponsors and #middlemarket CEOs are navigating in today's challenging exit market. - Operational Improvements: Get leaner, cut the fat. Tighten supply chains, cut costs, and improve team productivity to drive internal value. - Digital Transformation: Data is key, use it to drive better decisions. Using business intelligence and AI today will position the business for future growth. - Adapting to Market Realities: Short-term wins are necessary, but they need to be balanced with scalable, sustainable growth. At Strategic Ops Partners, this is what we do—execute our proprietary operational playbook to unlock EBITDA. #PrivateEquity #ValueCreation #OperationalExcellence #ExitStrategy

3

- With distributions harder to come by this year, more firms have been thinking about GP-led secondaries processes as an alternative path to exit. -Far from being a short-term fix, however, some believe these transactions could be seen as a “new normal” for exiting private equity assets. - A number of LPs are assuming that there will be little to no IPOs - Today you have more deals being done on the GP-led side than on the IPO side. - There could be €50 billion to €60 billion worth of GP-led transactions executed this year. - Supply is coming from GPs looking for alternative exit routes, demand is also coming from new LPs entering the sector.

2

1 Comment

A Trade You Don't Make Inspired by the NBA Finals and from a WSJ story... There is an interesting lesson for companies to have a long-term view with some of your key people (while also having a discerning eye for talent). Summary: - There was a lot of pressure a few years ago to trade away Boston Celtics players Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown - critics called them overrated due to playoff failures - Turns out, the decision *not* to trade them has proven pivotal - they are central to the Boston Celtics' success in the NBA Finals - The retention of Tatum & Brown underscores the value of stability and growth within a team, countering pressures and criticisms with patience and long-term commitment to process and progress - Their performance in the Finals highlights the advantages of maintaining core players and evolve them, overcoming past past failures and solidifying their roles as integral components of a championship-contending team --- Source: WSJ - https://lnkd.in/eMUk4WQE --- #business #ceo #cro #pe #privateequity #talent #teams

5

I used to think LPs only invested in emerging VC / PE firms for better returns. That’s true…sort of They obviously first and foremost want high returns, but in building our firm and studying the industry I’ve learned that LP motivations are more nuanced than that To understand why an LP really might invest in us, I start with the assumption that they could invest that $ in Blackstone (or a similar large PE firm with top quartile track record) What could we offer that is incremental, and how should we position ourselves in that way? 1. Smaller funds can be higher upside — LPs may be looking for higher risk / higher return opportunities, so we have to emphasize the path to outlier returns. This means discussing not only their expected value but also the distribution of outcomes, and how that might differ from the rest of their portfolio 2. Harder to partner with successful firms later — LPs are often looking to build long-term partnerships with firms that will be around for many fund cycles, and that is about more than just returns. It’s important to emphasize not just the strategy of this fund but also the vision of the firm we’re building 3. Co-invest opportunities — Some LPs don’t care about co-invest, others only invest in funds for co-invest. When speaking with the latter, we emphasize that we have a disciplined and repeatable process to generate and share co-invest opportunities (easy to say, harder to execute) 4. Learning and thought partnership — We have LPs that invested in us because they have conviction in or personal passion for health & wellness and want to learn more about the ecosystem. For these folks we might talk through investment opportunities they see that are in our industry, or invite them to industry events. We also spend a ton of time writing quarterly letters to help them track the industry and learn from our companies It takes years to know where our returns will ultimately shake out, and we’ll have no reason or permission to exist if they aren’t good In the meantime it’s crucial to recognize and deliver on these other needs of our LPs, to provide the experience that they signed up for

94

6 Comments

Citrin Cooperman has a new #PrivateEquity investor: a Blackstone-led investor group has acquired a majority stake in the US-based CPA firm, giving it a $2 Bn enterprise value! The #PE group acquired this stake from New Mountain Capital, marking the entry of this $1 Tn giant into the #accounting industry. Since 2021, the accounting industry has seen an influx of deals, with Citrin Cooperman becoming the first firm to undergo these changes twice. Reading more on the deal from Financial Times, here is what I could understand: - The Blackstone-led consortium will hold a majority ownership exceeding two-thirds, incorporating smaller investors to ensure Blackstone’s stake remains below 50%. This structure addresses regulatory concerns regarding Citrin Cooperman’s audit business independence. - New Mountain became one of the pioneers among major private equity firms to venture into the U.S. accounting industry when it acquired a controlling stake in Citrin Cooperman in late 2021. The deal valued the accountancy firm at approximately $500 million. The sale of this stake has been closely watched within the sector as an indicator of current valuations. - According to sources with knowledge of the transaction, #Blackstone is acquiring Citrin Cooperman at a valuation approximately 15 times its EBITDA, a significant increase from the 11 times EBITDA multiple #NewMountain paid during its initial acquisition. - Private equity ownership has significantly accelerated merger and acquisition activity within the accounting sector. According to sources familiar with the numbers, when New Mountain acquired Citrin Cooperman three years ago, the firm’s revenue was approximately $350 million. By 2024, this figure had surged to around $850 million, driven by a series of strategic acquisitions of regional accounting firms. This growth has positioned Citrin Cooperman among the top 20 largest accounting firms in the U.S. Under the Blackstone agreement, Citrin Cooperman partners will retain the majority of their ownership in the firm while benefiting from a partial share sale, according to sources familiar with the deal. Partners were informed about the specifics during a briefing on Monday. Over time, management is expected to gradually increase their ownership stake by allocating performance-based bonuses. Allan Koltin, CEO of Koltin Consulting Group, Inc. and advisor on the deal, noted the groundbreaking nature of this transaction within the accounting profession. He anticipates this precedent will lead to similar future transactions, underscoring the evolving landscape of private equity involvement in accounting firms. #privateequity #accounting #exit #pe #investment

266

5 Comments

In PE, when you buy a company you're in business with the founders & the management team even though the PE firm owns the company. Success is a function of collaborative partnership & teamwork. PE firms that have this partnership philosophy are well positioned on the path to achieve top decile IRR. #pe #privateequity

70

1 Comment