𝗢𝘄𝗻 𝗼𝗿 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗚𝗧𝗠 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸? Last week, I shared some thoughts on “Service-as-a-Software” and how agencies can adopt outcomes-based models by providing access to tools, so clients focus on results and not the hassle of upgrading their martech stacks. The idea sparked some interesting conversations: 1️⃣ 𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲? Not necessarily. For SMBs, outsourcing tools often makes sense; it’s flexible, fast, and avoids large upfront costs. But for larger enterprises, it gets more complicated: Ownership of data, integrations, and even legal concerns can make outsourcing less viable. ⤷ The sweet spot for agencies? Complementing core systems (like CRMs, MAPs, paid advertising suits) without replacing them, while still driving results quickly and efficiently for their clients. 2️⃣ 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗱𝗼 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗱𝗱 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹? As AI continues to simplify execution, and with Vertical AI Agents in the horizon, the role of agencies is shifting. It’s no longer enough to just connect tools or manage campaigns. The real opportunity lies in solving complex, unique problems that off-the-shelf solutions can’t handle, and delivering the kind of creative and strategic thinking that AI can’t replicate. ⤷ Agencies that master this balance, being both enablers and creative partners, are the ones that will thrive in this new model. 3️⃣ 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆? A big concern is, what happens if the agency relationship ends? If the tools and workflows are tied too closely to the agency, transitioning away can become a challenge. But here’s the thing: the tools an agency brings in don’t have to be exclusive to them. This approach can actually be a great way for companies to test tools without committing to buying them outright. ⤷ If the relationship ends, the company can always choose to purchase specific tools directly and integrate them into their own stack as part of the transition. In this way, the agency acts as a low-risk entry point to explore and validate new tools before making a long-term investment. Take a look at the visual. It’s v1 of a framework to decide what to own and what to outsource in your GTM stack. Does this resonate with your experience? Are there areas where you think owning or outsourcing makes more sense? Thanks for all your feedback and for geeking out with me Andrea 🤓 Lechner-Becker Phil Gamache Odd Morten Sørensen Patrice Greene Juan Pablo Garcia Jon Pittham
This is a keeper Agustín, I'm going to print it out and use it for my upcoming revised strategy/planning sessions.
Agustín Rejón you need about 1,500 more logos in that CRM / MAP bucket 😆
Neither Looker nor Mixpanel is a causal analytics tool. Looker is data visualization, and Mixpanel is a correlation-based behavior tracking / journey mapping tool.
I'd be interested in understanding any kind of take up of this model. I can see the benefits of it but I think there would be a premium on the cost of services as each 'stack' would need to be created for each client, to manage data governance effectively. Interesting topic!
Agustín Rejón. Great view here. I would add Full Funnel Attribution as a key "service as a software area" for agencies. We are seeing agencies not only need to plan and execute campaigns but also need to continuously measure and improve the full funnel impact. We RevSure AI do this for the complex mid-market and enterprise B2B motion.
+ Brains and Hands for your Marketo team | @Kapturall
3moThanks Agustín! I still believe the issues are different depending on the size of the company, as you summarise in point 1. I also think that from the “non equilateral triangle of people, process and technology” (as Mark Stouse says) the hardest is people! So agencies help to deal with that part. Tech? The final user, the agency or the vendor (pay as you go… Nespresso model for the CRM?) can deliver it in any way. But the question is who manages it to achieve results. And that’s where agencies have an advantage, not because or chosen tools. Besides that, I expect “tech” to be owned and governed by the natural ruler: the CIO