Review for John Lanchester’s ‘The Wall’. 📚
Described by The Daily Express as ‘a 1984 for our times’, John Lanchester’s (2019) ‘The Wall’ is certainly thought-provoking: the astute political and class commentary; the shrewd inter-generational conflicts, deductions, and observations; and the simultaneously subtle and explicit xenophobic explorations and critiques.
But, I think – and hopefully you will forgive me for saying – all those things, insightful and interesting as they are, are almost expected from a novel with such a title, published in such a time.
So, instead, I wanted to remark on how well-researched this novel is: how believable the Defenders’ life on the Wall is; how realistic cold and time feel; even how acutely Lanchester has captured characters’ feelings for one another between long, monotonous shifts. Extended stretches of boring – but boring is safe; no news is good news – interspersed with fleeting moments of panic and chaos.
Overall, the novel is excellent (though I kept finding myself wanting to know more about the state of the rest of the world – has everyone thrown up a Wall? – which only serves to highlight Lanchester’s skill), but I can’t help loving the first half the most, purely because of its own single-minded coldness and realism.
💬 Have you read 'The Wall' before?
#RossTurnerAcademics #johnlanchester #bookreview
President of the Drexel University Real Estate Club
10moGood work Albert!