Federal contractors, the answer to winning is Not writing proposal after loser proposal. It is not choosing an AI Proposal Software or Search engine to look for and write more loser proposals. Federal Contracting is about building solid relationships with the people inside the agencies who buy and need what you offer, uncovering gaps in the current incumbents’ offering and winning ‘under the radar’ opportunities where you are one of the only few who can fill that gap with precise, timely, fairly priced solutions. Let the losers chase the ops in SAM and GSA that are due in three days. Let the losers spend a year getting their AI proposal software to create good enough outlines to help them turn in general answers/solutions that look an awful lot like all the other loser submissions. Meanwhile, you are actually finding ways into the agencies talking to the people who need what you offer right now. Then you are only bidding on opportunities you knew were coming or better yet winning sole source ops no one ever saw coming. The Public Bid system is what it is: public. But if you look at the data of contracts awarded, 50% or more of the ops only received 1-3 bids. Not because there weren’t others who could have done the work. No. It’s because the buyer found a way to legally perform an award with limited competition utilizing a current contract and a prime in place, modifying a current project, using a contract vehicle needing only 3 bids or sole sourcing it with a legit justifiable reason. Bottom line: It’s a Relationship. They need to know, trust and love you before handing over millions of dollars to you. They want the best at a reasonable price. Lead with your capabilities, best values, past performance and proven solutions…..close with your contract vehicles and set asides. Want to know more about how to win-specific to your specialty? Three-Step Program Customized for you. https://lnkd.in/gTdKRwaV Eileen Kent
I love your wisdom.
I agree
Insightful
This is the truth! When I was a buyer for the USDA Agricultural Research Service, we had to sole source or limit competition. We were hated within and without the US Government for this, but the reality was that we needed quality. To us, quality meant compatibility with existing systems and procedures. Quality meant using the same things that cooperators outside of the government used. Quality meant consistency and reliability. Too many people in the GovCon space just don't want to hear this. Long story short: if you do not sell what your end-users want or need, they will find a way around you. Mutual trust and positive working relationships are the way to go.
Eileen Kent Relationship is Key.. Totally agree.
Truer words have never been spoken!
This post rocks but everyone in the prop industry except the people with authority to keep pushing through bad decisions. As capture or proposal managers, we can give 11 exacts about how we’ll lose the bid, but many higher ups have stars in their eyes and don’t pay attention to their MBA training/supposed care for budgets and expenses. So my question for the past few years has been this: how do we get their attention and persuade them to listen to the proposal people they hired?
Thank you, Eileen Kent—this is exactly the insight I needed to reflect on.
You are not wrong. Love reading your posts, Eileen Kent
Senior Talent Acquisition Partner | Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Strategist | AI Enthusiast | Personal Development Advocate
2moFacts!