An interesting 'who has authority?' dilemma as UAS continue to proliferate there’s increased appetite for people to acquire and operate counter-UAS systems, Under current law under certain conditions, the DHS has the authority to interdict and bring down drones that are operating in an unsafe manner. The proposed legislation extends that power to the FAA under limited circumstances. How do your resolve this? What are the repercussions? "A bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives earlier this month would extend the authority of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to mitigate threats from errant unmanned aerial systems, while also granting the FAA some additional counter-UAS (Uncrewed Air System) power." "The Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, introduced in the House Homeland Security Committee, replaces the Preventing Emerging Threats Act of 2018, slated to expire soon The bipartisan legislation marks the most significant effort that Congress has yet undertaken to counter the growing threats posed by drones operated in an unsafe or malicious manner near airports and other critical infrastructure, or densely crowded venues such as football stadiums." "A bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives earlier this month would extend the authority of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to mitigate threats from errant unmanned aerial systems, while also granting the FAA some additional counter-UAS power." "The Counter-UAS bill would extend existing DHS and DOJ counter-UAS authorities through October 1, 2028. According to a statement by Republican members of the House Homeland Security Committee, among other measures, the legislation will: 1) Clarify and improve coordination requirements among DHS, DOJ, the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the FAA. 2) Ensure that information gathered by approved counter-UAS systems is not misused or retained for extended periods of time. 3) Prohibit DHS and DOJ from using or authorizing the use of counter-UAS systems that have been manufactured by certain foreign (notably Chinese) companies. 4) Provide Homeland Security Investigations, the principal investigative component of DHS, with counter-UAS authority; and provide DHS with counter-UAS authority to protect public airports. 5) Allow DHS to authorize the acquisition, deployment, and operation of counter-UAS systems by owners or operators of covered sites and critical infrastructure. 6) Require DHS to establish a counter-UAS mitigation pilot program, designating five pilot sites under which selected state law enforcement agencies may operate approved counter-UAS mitigation systems. 7) Require the FAA, in coordination with DHS and DOJ, to develop a plan for counter-UAS operations at airports." #counteruasdrone #uasdroneregulations https://lnkd.in/eahKizTK
How do you deal with UAS regulations?
More Relevant Posts
-
At the bottom of this article, you will find a link to submit the following petition to your state legislators. Over half a million people have already signed it: "I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the recent incidents of mysterious drones flying uncontrolled over the Eastern Seaboard. For 25 days, these drones have operated with impunity, causing alarm among local communities, particularly in New Jersey, where local leaders have been left without answers from state officials. The absence of our Governor at four scheduled meetings with local elected officials only exacerbates the public's unease. Moreover, the federal briefings on Capitol Hill have left many questioning the competence or perhaps the transparency of our Department of Defense regarding this threat. We have seen claims of a possible "mothership" off our coast denied by official channels, yet no clear explanation or action has been forthcoming. This scenario echoes the Chinese spy balloon incident, yet the response seems even more lackluster here. The capability to trace, identify, and neutralize these drones exists. Yet, there has been a visible failure to act, suggesting either a paralysis in decision-making or a lack of information, both of which are unacceptable. I demand: TRANSPARENCY: Immediate disclosure of what is known about these drones, their origins, and capabilities. The public has a right to be informed about threats to their security. ACTION: Deployment of necessary countermeasures to intercept, disable, or down these drones. Our military and security agencies must demonstrate their readiness to protect our skies. INVESTIGATION: A thorough investigation into why there has been such a delay in response and whether there has been any cover-up or inaction due to political or bureaucratic reasons. ACCOUNTABILITY: Those responsible for the oversight or failure in this situation must be held accountable. This includes both civilian leadership and military command. The world is watching how we handle this threat. A failure to respond not only endangers lives but also undermines our national sovereignty and our citizens' confidence in their government. I urge you to use your influence to push for these demands to be met without further delay. Our national defense must not be compromised, and the safety of American citizens should never be taken for granted."
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
It’s on everyone’s minds, Mysterious Drones Across the U.S. – What’s Going On? 👽🛸🚁 Thousands of unexplained drone sightings have been reported across the United States in recent weeks, from military bases in New Jersey to airports in California. Citizens are demanding answers, but so far, authorities remain tight-lipped. 🔹 In New Jersey, drones have been spotted over military installations and sensitive airspace, causing significant alarm. Some bases have responded by installing military-grade drone detection systems to identify and neutralize potential threats. 🔹 Donald Trump is canceling his trip to Bedminster out of caution, reportedly due to drones seen flying over the area. What We Know: 🛸 The FBI is actively investigating thousands of these sightings nationwide, but details remain scarce. 🛸 Airports in California have reported drones disrupting air traffic, leading to serious safety and operational concerns. 🛸 Some drones are reported to be highly sophisticated, raising questions about their origins and intent. The Theories: 1️⃣ Foreign Surveillance: Are these drones part of an operation conducted by Iranian operatives or other foreign actors? 2️⃣ Government Activity: Is the U.S. government searching for nuclear traces or testing new surveillance technology? 3️⃣ Unauthorized Civil or Commercial Drones: Are rogue operators pushing legal boundaries? 4️⃣ Aliens? As always, UFO theories haven’t been ruled out. 5️⃣ Security Vulnerabilities: Could critical U.S. infrastructure be exposed to new, emerging threats? The Growing Concern: 🔹 Citizens are frustrated by the lack of answers from authorities. 🔹 The FBI’s ongoing investigations show the scale and seriousness of the problem, but the silence fuels speculation. 🔹 Military bases are already deploying advanced detection systems—what do they know that we don’t? Key Questions: 👽 Who is operating these drones—and why 👽 How are they bypassing airspace security near critical sites? 👽 Are we prepared to defend against coordinated drone activity? This isn’t a story to ignore. As drones become more sophisticated and accessible, incidents like these highlight vulnerabilities in national security and aviation safety. What do you think? 🔹 Should authorities be more transparent with the public? 🔹 Is this the sign of a new security threat we’re not ready for? Let’s discuss in the comments. ==================================== Follow me for mind blowing information and cybersecurity news. Stay safe and secure! ==================================== #Drones #NationalSecurity #FBIInvestigation #UAV #CriticalInfrastructure #AviationSafety #TechNews #HomelandSecurity #Trump #DroneThreats
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Stakeholders and organizations are applauding bipartisan legislation introduced by U.S. Senators Gary Peters (D-MI), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) and John Hoeven (R-ND) that would significantly enhance our nation’s ability to counter the security threats posed by unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), commonly known as drones. The bill will renew and expand existing authorities – set to expire in September 2023 – that provide the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the U.S. Department of Justice with necessary tools to effectively counter security threats to Americans, large crowds, and infrastructure posed by dangerous UAS. The National Football League (NFL) supports the ‘Safeguarding the Homeland from the Threats Posed by Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act of 2023.’ This common sense, urgently needed legislation would more effectively protect our homeland – including mass gatherings and critical infrastructure – from the serious and rising security risks posed by rogue drones,” said Cathy Lanier, Chief Security Officer, National Football League. “Keeping fans safe at our games is our top priority, and this legislation would give local law enforcement the tools they need to protect our fans from the threats of illicit drone use. We call on Congress to enact this vital legislation as soon as possible.” Major League Baseball (MLB), along with other professional sports organizations, collectively host thousands of events for millions of fans each year. Many of these events occur in open-air stadiums and other venues at which unauthorized drone incursions are common. The Safeguarding the Homeland from the Threats Posed by Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act of 2023 would take critical steps to promote drone security at our stadiums,” said Major League Baseball Vice President for Security and Ballpark Operations David Thomas. “We appreciate the leadership of Sen. Gary Peters, Sen. Ron Johnson, Sen. Kyrsten Sinema and Sen. John Hoeven to move this important piece of legislation forward.” “The NCAA and its member schools and conferences host millions of college athletes, families and fans during regular season and championship games each year and this legislation is an important step in continuing to ensure the safety of Americans who love and celebrate college sports,” said Dan Gavitt, NCAA Senior Vice President of Basketball. “Unauthorized and unsafe drone operations represent an emerging threat to our communities. However, there is currently little that law enforcement can do to respond to these incidents as counter-drone (cUAS) authorities do not extend to state and local law enforcement,” said Eddie Garcia , Chief of Police, Dallas Police Department and President, Major Cities Chiefs Association #CUAS #ATTRAP #REMI #Innovation #NationalSecurity
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Evolving UAS threats encompass advancements in drone technology and tactics used for malicious purposes:Increased Payload Capacity: Drones can carry heavier payloads, including explosives, chemical agents, or electronic warfare equipment, posing greater risks to security.Swarming Attacks: Coordinated attacks by multiple drones acting autonomously or under remote control, overwhelming defense systems.Stealth and Low-Visibility Features: Drones designed to evade detection through low radar cross-sections, noise reduction, or camouflage.Longer Range and Endurance: UAS with extended flight ranges and endurance, allowing them to travel greater distances and conduct prolonged surveillance or attacks.Autonomous Operations: Drones equipped with artificial intelligence and advanced sensors capable of autonomous navigation and decision-making, reducing reliance on human operators.Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities: Exploiting vulnerabilities in UAS communication systems or hacking into control interfaces to hijack or disrupt drone operationsAdaptation to Countermeasures: Rapid adaptation of UAS tactics in response to defensive measures, such as using decoys or encrypted communication.What are the different techniques employed to reduce direct UAS strikes on fixed and mobile assetsDetection Systems: Employing radar, acoustic sensors, and electro-optical systems to detect incoming UAS threats.Counter-UAS (C-UAS) Systems: Using technologies like jamming, directed energy weapons, and net guns to neutralize or disrupt hostile drones.Physical Barriers: Installing barriers such as nets, fences, or bollards to prevent unauthorized access or to intercept UAS.Regulatory Measures: Implementing strict regulations and policies regarding UAS operations, including no-fly zones and licensing requirements.Training and Awareness: Educating personnel about UAS threats, their capabilities, and how to respond effectively.Surveillance and Monitoring: Utilizing drones or other aerial surveillance platforms to monitor airspace and detect potential threats.Collaboration and Intelligence Sharing: Sharing information and intelligence regarding UAS threats among relevant stakeholders, including military, law enforcement, and private sector entities.Research and Development: Investing in the development of advanced C-UAS technologies to stay ahead of evolving UAS threats.#drones #artificialintelligence #assymetricwarfare #operatioonsintelligence
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Senate Poised to Vote on Landmark Drone Security Legislation Amid Rising Incidents A surge in unauthorized drone activity near critical infrastructure has prompted urgent legislative action, as the Senate prepares to vote on comprehensive drone security measures, reports Detroit News. The Safeguarding the Homeland from the Threats Posed by Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act, spearheaded by Senator Gary Peters (D-MI), would significantly expand federal and local authorities' ability to counter drone threats according to recent developments in drone security incidents. The legislation arrives amid escalating concerns over drone incursions at sensitive locations. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base recently suspended operations for four hours due to intense drone activity, while New Jersey's Picatinny Arsenal and other critical facilities have reported suspicious drone presence. These incidents highlight vulnerabilities in current drone detection and mitigation capabilities across critical infrastructure sectors. Beyond military installations, civilian infrastructure has proven equally vulnerable. A particularly concerning incident occurred at Detroit's Comerica Park, where an unauthorized drone disrupted a Green Day concert, forcing the band to halt their performance. This incident exemplifies the growing challenges faced by law enforcement and security personnel in protecting large public gatherings. The proposed legislation would establish a pioneering framework for drone threat response, enabling the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice to disable drones deemed security risks. Notably, the bill introduces a pilot program granting state and local law enforcement agencies similar counter-drone authorities, addressing a crucial gap in current security measures. Critical infrastructure operators, including stadium management and airport authorities, would gain enhanced capabilities to detect and track potential drone threats. Chad Newton, CEO of Wayne County Airport Authority, emphasizes how drone detection technology at Detroit Metropolitan Airport would strengthen aviation security across air transportation facilities. The legislation has garnered support from major sports organizations, with NFL Chief Security Officer Cathy Lanier highlighting its importance for protecting large-scale events. This backing underscores the growing consensus among security professionals about the need for robust counter-drone measures. While recreational and commercial drone operations remain legal under FAA certification, the increasing frequency of unauthorized flights has prompted calls for stronger enforcement mechanisms. Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard advocates for expanding local law enforcement's authority to enforce federal drone regulations, reflecting a broader push for more comprehensive drone security measures. The proliferation of consumer drone technology has created a complex security landscape where distinguishing be...
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The Growing Threat of UAP Drones: Security Challenges and Solutions The increasing prevalence of Unmanned Aerial Phenomena (UAP) drones presents a unique and pressing challenge for public safety, critical infrastructure, and national security. As someone with extensive experience in security assessments, asset protection, and public safety—including leveraging OSINT (Open-Source Intelligence)—I believe it’s essential to address this evolving threat head-on. The Threat Landscape UAP drones are not just a curiosity; they represent a tangible risk. These advanced drones, often operating with high levels of autonomy or unknown operators, have demonstrated the ability to breach restricted airspace, surveil sensitive locations, and disrupt operations. Whether the intent is malicious (espionage, sabotage) or unintentional (hobbyists crossing boundaries), the potential for harm is significant. What Is the FAA Doing? The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been working to address these risks by implementing measures such as: • Remote ID Requirements: Ensuring drones broadcast identifying information to enhance accountability. • Airspace Integration Policies: Developing frameworks to safely incorporate drones into U.S. airspace without compromising manned aviation. • Collaborations with Security Agencies: Coordinating efforts with federal, state, and local authorities to enhance enforcement and response capabilities. While these steps are critical, they are not foolproof, especially when dealing with advanced UAP drones that may not comply with regulations. Security Measures: A Proactive Approach From my perspective as a security expert with years of experience in law enforcement, violent crime operations, and OSINT, a comprehensive approach is vital: 1. Threat Assessments: Organizations must identify vulnerabilities in their operations that could be exploited by drones. 2. Perimeter Defense Technologies: Deploy counter-UAS (Unmanned Aircraft Systems) measures like radar, RF detection, and jamming technologies to secure assets. 3. OSINT Monitoring: Use OSINT to track online drone activity, forums, and marketplaces that might indicate emerging threats. 4. Legislative Advocacy: Push for stronger laws and enforcement mechanisms to deter misuse. 5. Public Awareness Campaigns: Educate communities about the risks of drones and the importance of responsible operation. Public Safety Comes First UAP drones are not a futuristic issue—they are a present-day challenge that demands immediate attention. By combining advanced technologies, intelligence gathering, and robust security protocols, we can mitigate the risks and protect both our assets and the public. What are your thoughts on the growing threat of UAP drones? Let’s discuss how we can stay ahead of this challenge. Jorge Reyes Jr., MSc, FSO, CISM, CHISSP, PMI-RMP #UAPThreats #Drones #PublicSafety #AssetProtection #SecurityAssessment #OSINT #FAARegulations #CounterUAS #Critical
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Latvia Accelerates Counter-Drone Capabilities Following Riga Airport Security Breach In a decisive response to recent drone incursions at Riga International Airport, Latvian Prime Minister Evika Siliņa has mandated a comprehensive overhaul of the nation's drone detection and countermeasure capabilities. The directive, issued following multiple airspace violations on January 13th, sets a February 5th deadline for the Ministry of Transport to present enhanced security protocols and technological solutions, reports BNN. Strategic Response to Emerging Threats The incidents at Riga International Airport highlight the growing challenges airports face from unauthorized drone operations. Three separate airspace restrictions were implemented on January 13th, each triggered by illegal drone activity within the airport's restricted zones. This series of incidents has prompted a rapid reassessment of Latvia's aviation security infrastructure. Integration of Advanced Detection Systems Prime Minister Siliņa revealed that the Ministry of Defence has already acquired new anti-air defense systems and is developing advanced drone detection capabilities. The initiative emphasizes the integration of multiple security layers, combining traditional aviation security with modern drone technology countermeasures. "All systems installed by the state in Latvia should be compatible with each other," Siliņa stated, emphasizing the need for seamless coordination between air defense, object identification, and interdiction capabilities across multiple agencies. Regulatory and Operational Framework The comprehensive review encompasses a thorough assessment of current response protocols and their effectiveness, alongside a detailed evaluation of official responsibilities and accountability. Officials are tasked with developing immediate countermeasure implementations while simultaneously creating sustainable long-term security solutions. A key focus remains on the integration of cross-ministry security systems to ensure comprehensive coverage and response capabilities. Geopolitical Context and Security Implications Latvia's position as a frontline NATO state adds significant weight to these security measures. "We cannot wait for Europe – we are the first to be affected by various threats," Siliņa emphasized, highlighting Latvia's three-year experience with heightened geopolitical tensions. The government has initiated a multi-agency approach, bringing together representatives from the Ministries of Transport and Interior, state security institutions, and aviation industry stakeholders to develop a coordinated response strategy. Future Implementation and Industry Impact The directive specifically tasks Riga International Airport, Latvian Air Traffic, and the Civil Aviation Agency with developing enhanced operational protocols. These measures will likely influence drone industry regulations and legal frameworks across the Baltic region. Latvia's aggressive timeli...
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Fast Guard Service, a premier security provider, is introducing advanced anti-drone solutions to address the growing concerns surrounding unauthorized drone activity in New Jersey and nationwide. The company employs state-of-the-art technology and highly trained personnel to protect clients from potential drone threats, including surveillance, trespassing, and safety hazards. 'Our mission is to provide a proactive and effective approach to drone threats,' said Roderick Payne, President of Fast Guard Service. 'By combining advanced detection systems with expert response teams, we're able to secure airspace and ensure peace of mind for our clients.' Fast Guard Service utilizes cutting-edge tools such as radar systems, RF detectors, and optical tracking systems to detect, identify, and track drones in real-time. The company offers various solutions for neutralizing unauthorized drones, including RF jamming technology, EMP and advanced countermeasures, interceptor drones, and net guns. These tools are deployed by trained professionals who operate within all federal and state regulations, ensuring safety and legal compliance. The anti-drone services are ideal for protecting VIPs, private estates, public and private events, corporate and industrial facilities, and critical infrastructure. Fast Guard Service collaborates with local law enforcement and government agencies to ensure a coordinated response to drone threats and assist authorities in identifying operators and addressing future risks. #dronethreats #antidrone #securitysolutions @fastguardservice
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Senate Poised to Vote on Landmark Drone Security Legislation Amid Rising Incidents A surge in unauthorized drone activity near critical infrastructure has prompted urgent legislative action, as the Senate prepares to vote on comprehensive drone security measures, reports Detroit News. The Safeguarding the Homeland from the Threats Posed by Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act, spearheaded by Senator Gary Peters (D-MI), would significantly expand federal and local authorities' ability to counter drone threats according to recent developments in drone security incidents. The legislation arrives amid escalating concerns over drone incursions at sensitive locations. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base recently suspended operations for four hours due to intense drone activity, while New Jersey's Picatinny Arsenal and other critical facilities have reported suspicious drone presence. These incidents highlight vulnerabilities in current drone detection and mitigation capabilities across critical infrastructure sectors. Beyond military installations, civilian infrastructure has proven equally vulnerable. A particularly concerning incident occurred at Detroit's Comerica Park, where an unauthorized drone disrupted a Green Day concert, forcing the band to halt their performance. This incident exemplifies the growing challenges faced by law enforcement and security personnel in protecting large public gatherings. The proposed legislation would establish a pioneering framework for drone threat response, enabling the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice to disable drones deemed security risks. Notably, the bill introduces a pilot program granting state and local law enforcement agencies similar counter-drone authorities, addressing a crucial gap in current security measures. Critical infrastructure operators, including stadium management and airport authorities, would gain enhanced capabilities to detect and track potential drone threats. Chad Newton, CEO of Wayne County Airport Authority, emphasizes how drone detection technology at Detroit Metropolitan Airport would strengthen aviation security across air transportation facilities. The legislation has garnered support from major sports organizations, with NFL Chief Security Officer Cathy Lanier highlighting its importance for protecting large-scale events. This backing underscores the growing consensus among security professionals about the need for robust counter-drone measures. While recreational and commercial drone operations remain legal under FAA certification, the increasing frequency of unauthorized flights has prompted calls for stronger enforcement mechanisms. Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard advocates for expanding local law enforcement's authority to enforce federal drone regulations, reflecting a broader push for more comprehensive drone security measures. The proliferation of consumer drone technology has created a complex security landscape where distinguishing be...
To view or add a comment, sign in