No surprise here for anyone involved in venturing, but a good overview of the situation and an opportunity to add my perspective. “We’ve raised a lot of money, and we’ve given very little back,” Thomas Laffont, co-founder of investment firm Coatue Management, said at a recent conference. “We are bleeding cash as an industry.” "There are currently more than 1,400 startups valued at $1 billion or more—so-called unicorns—according to a recent presentation from Coatue. All have investors waiting to get rich." “There are companies that are 13, 14, 15 years old. This is beyond any historic standard. And there are over a thousand of them,” said Bill Gurley, a partner at the venture firm Benchmark. There are several contributing factors that led to this situation, and I'll just list a few in order of importance: 1) There was way too much capital raised and invested by the venture capital 'industry' (hint as to the problem), which is best viewed and practiced as a discipline dependent on individual talent. 2) Valuations were falsely elevated due in no small part to excessive VC, and they still haven't corrected (see Gurley's comment -- most of these ventures are still valued far too high). 3) Big Techs became too big and crossed the antitrust line long ago. VC has become increasingly reliant on flipping to Big Techs in particular to achieve attractive ROIs when they should have been focused on building sustainable companies. M&A has always been a significant source of exits / liquidity / and ROI, but it reached 70% of total ROI for VC in the U.S. a couple years ago. If we were seeking to blame, there is plenty to go around. 1) Excessive monetary and fiscal stimulus inflated bubbles in all assets, including VC, and we still haven't seen a correction in most assets. 2) Big Techs have abused market power, engaged in regulatory capture, and generally behaved in a predatory manner, distorting and manipulating markets. 3) VCs had about as much discipline in managing capital as Congress... the level of fund raising in some funds is obscene, and that it's still centralized around SV is inexcusable. It's bad for the economy. 4) Like VCs, too many entrepreneurs became experts in raising capital, rather than building lasting companies. While I agree that the Trump admin will likely be friendlier to M&A, and we do need more of it, I really don't think it will be sufficient to bale out the majority of VC firms and unicorns that haven't marked their valuations to the actual market. Big Techs will likely still have handcuffs, as well they should. That said, we shouldn't punish entrepreneurs and VCs for what Big Techs, Congress and regulators have done. The 3rd and 4th tier in tech need to step up their game in M&A, as should other industries.
Mark Montgomery’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Interesting read from the Wall Street Journal to think about with your morning coffee ☕ I've been posting about the lack of exits from venture capital backed companies and some VC firms have been buying back positions held by their investors. The WSJ takes a look and sees a disturbing trend.... Silicon Valley’s venture-capital firms are having an easy time finding promising startups to back. The hard part is cashing out. Last year, U.S. venture firms returned $26 billion worth of shares back to their investors, the lowest amount since 2011. Startup investors say 2024 has continued the trend, with high levels of investment and few acquisition deals or initial public offerings. Last year, U.S. venture firms invested $60 billion more than they collected. As a result, the investors that back VC firms, such as university endowments and pension funds, aren’t seeing the type of profits the industry has long delivered. #venturecapital
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Good read on some dynamics in today’s venture landscape. This won’t get talked about as much in the headlines, but I think it’s important for founders (and their equity investors) to keep tapping flexible capital partners on the credit side. I have some obvious bias here, but with the right partner, custom debt or hybrid solutions can be the best outcome for management and investors, especially from a dilution perspective. Credit partners who thoughtfully lean into this market will play a key role as 1,000+ unicorns and others map out the best paths to hit key milestones like next equity rounds, profitability, or achieving M&A/IPO scale without sacrificing the growth needed to stay attractive to private or public investors. Note: These views are my own and not associated with any company I am part of. “To get around the crunch, venture firms are getting creative. Some are shopping around their startups to private-equity buyers, while others are buying out their own stakes in startups to deliver profits to their investors.” https://lnkd.in/eYrXe8VA
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
A venture capital conundrum: >1400 startups valued at $1bn+, but no exits Lots of investing + few exits = either low returns to investors and/or VCs becoming more creative with exit strategies (buying own shares and/or turning to PE to buy portfolio companies) "...Silicon Valley’s #venturecapital firms are having an easy time finding promising startups to back. The hard part is cashing out...", reports The Wall Street Journal. Key #VC trends: - Last year, U.S. venture firms returned $26 bn worth of shares back to their investors, the lowest amount since 2011 - Startup investors say 2024 has continued the trend, with high levels of investment and few acquisition deals or initial public offerings - Last year, U.S. venture firms invested $60 bn more than they collected, the highest such deficit in PitchBook 26 years of data - The decline is particularly notable because the past three years have been the highest three on record for total VC firm investments since 1998 - Some #venturecapitalists say one hope for change is that the incoming Trump administration might loosen #regulations and spur more #dealmaking, in part by installing business-friendly regulators - Venture firms themselves have made IPOs less necessary. Many have swelled in size in recent years, allowing them to bankroll startups indefinitely while also buying out employee shares in so-called tender offers - Even if tech IPOs returned to their historic pace, it would take more than 20 years for all of (the 1400+ unicorns) to go public, according to Coatue Berber J. #futureoftech #investmentideas #investmentbankers #ipo #mergersandacquisitions #techinvesting #healthcareinvesting #futureofhealth #healthinnovation #techinnovation #investmentreturns #investmenttrends #startups #startupfundraising #exit #startupfounders #growthstrategy #corporatestrategy #regulations #techregulations #profitgeneration #profits #returnoninvestment #unicorns
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In 2023 VCs returned the lowest level of capital to their investors since 2011 https://lnkd.in/g8hkdTaD #VCs #venturecapital In 2023, the U.S. VC industry invested $60 billion more into startups than it collected back in returns, according to The Wall Street Journal, citing PitchBook data. That is the largest deficit recorded in PitchBook’s 26 years of data. The data also found that U.S. VCs only returned $26 billion worth of shares back to their investors in 2023, the lowest total since 2011. No surprise because most VCs don’t add much value so must be discerning and selective to engage with right ones 😉 https://lnkd.in/gKXfFKMZ - 33% of founders said that they felt VCs simply weren’t honest about the expertise they could offer - 65% said VCs missed mark delivering beyond cash - Female founders rated value-add as twice as important than males - Value-add includes connections to partners, customers, talent, sharing knowledge Lean AI startups are new black so get to $100K MRR than raise seed at 3x valuation of of pre seed then race to $10M ARR with $100M valuation with awesome cap table where VC's own 20% max. Cheers.....Steve AI startup advisor 'force multiplier' https://lnkd.in/g38mWcs
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
One of the TRICKIEST parts of VC investing is the feedback loop: Investing in a currently-hot area results in positive peer feedback and headlines today. But deeper down we know that the path to the best returns is to be non-consensus and right (because of lower entry prices, fewer well-funded competitors, etc). That means investing in an area that doesn’t make sense to most VCs and doesn’t yield great peer feedback in the moment… I wrote a Ubiquity Ventures blog post about this idea — here’s a snippet: == “The VC industry can often devolve into the model of little kids playing soccer where investors abandon their field positions to chase the ball wherever it goes. It is these hotter investment sectors that “make a lot of sense” that draw in the majority of venture capital investment and broader attention — as measured by Gartner reports, TechCrunch conferences or viral tweets. However, by the time a sector has garnered so much buzz, the attractive investment opportunities are gone. It was Stanford professor Jeffrey Pfeffer who wrote, “You can’t do normal things and expect abnormal returns.” It is precisely because these investment areas feel so lucrative that they are not. Hot sectors attract massive amounts of venture capital which bid up startup valuations. At best, this compresses investment returns and at worst it creates a hyper-competitive industry of startups with “capital cannons” (to use Masa at Softbank’s mafia-style phrasing) aimed at one another. The lesson here, as one of my favorite Ubiquity LPs Chris Douvos likes to say, is to “optimize one’s discomfort” as opposed to chasing the comfortable. == https://lnkd.in/gv9vy8_2 #deeptech #venturecapital #startups
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Family offices are increasingly acting like private equity funds, directly investing in companies rather than just managing wealth. This trend signifies a shift in investment strategies, where sophisticated, well-funded investors are actively seeking opportunities in innovative sectors. The top 10 family offices for startup investments on CNBC highlights some of the leading family offices making significant investments in startups. These family offices, such as Hillspire, Thiel Capital, and Aglaé, are characterized by their growing teams of experts in deal-making and technology analysis. This infrastructure enables them to effectively evaluate and participate in startup opportunities. #FamilyOffices #StartupInvestments #VentureCapital #InvestmentTrends #PrivateEquity #WealthManagement #Innovation #DealMaking #TechInvestments https://lnkd.in/grA-jywK
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Some interesting points about venture investing by family offices made in the CNBC article below: According to PwC, almost a third of startup capital came from family offices in 2022 (2024 data not available). This article points out that a major trend has family offices “co-investing” as partners alongside a VC fund, which leads the investment (often with lower fees than LPs). This arrangement is a win-win: lower risk for the family offices who don't have the in-house expertise or bandwidth to effectively source and vet early stage opportunities and large pools of funds for VCs to put to work. Among the drivers for venture investments by family offices is the desire to stay ahead of the technology curve. Family office advisors point out that serial investors often take the perspective that investing in startups is a way to get a first-hand and early understanding of specific technologies and markets, knowledge which they can put to use in larger investments or inside their own companies. This has multiple potential benefits, from providing early stage companies with the inside opportunities to accelerate R&D and go-to-market, while offering the portfolio companies of the investors early access to implement and reap the rewards of emerging technologies. #familyoffice #investing #tech #startups #venturecapital #vc #alternativeinvesting #vcfunds #earlyadaptors #researchanddevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
According to Fast Company, it’s not just US citizens looking to expand their footprint to the 🇬🇧UK in this geo political climate… 🇺🇸US venture capital funds are flocking to London, albeit for different reasons - with the big players like Andreessen Horowitz, FTV Capital, Sequoia Capital, and General Catalyst all opening offices across the pond. It’s no secret, the UK is a strategic location in the global tech growth ecosystem with its key talent pool and thriving innovation, including expertise in #AI, #lifesciences, and #sustainability which make it an ideal launchpad for scaling companies globally. London also acts as a springboard for founders to raise investment before launching themselves into the US market: London startups have collectively raised over $20b in #VC funding since the start of 2023, including over $8.1b in the first three quarters of 2024 alone. Investors are also catching on to the valuation arbitrage between the UK and the US. 🤓A good deal, and a good cup of tea☕️ . Cheerio! Frontline Ventures William McQuillan London & Partners Accel Bessemer Venture Partners TDK Ventures Esther Reynal de St Michel Richardot Pamela Walker Geddes Tatum Getty https://lnkd.in/gi2J-wef
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
5 charts: This is what happens when startups can’t go public They recorded just $149 billion in exit value in the US last year, the third year in a row the figure came in below 2018 levels
To view or add a comment, sign in