Matt Richardson’s Post

View profile for Matt Richardson

Senior Embedded Software Engineer at Cardinal Peak

Because when you try to cram a different set of rules where they are not desired by the employees, you are saying to those employees "The government knows best. Not you." Gig jobs provide a flexibility (at a cost) that a standard 9-5 with health insurance does not. If you eliminate gig jobs (or any other contracting job for that matter) you are often destroying opportunity for those who require that flexibility. Not every job needs to be a government or union backed job.

View profile for Warren Rutherford

Owner @ The Executive Suite | Executive Search | Growth & Personal Transition Planning | Management Training.

So, taxi company drivers are employees, and taxi company expenses are built into cab fees. Why should Uber and Lyft be different? These are not technology companies as are argued. I don't agree that these 2 companies should provide their "drivers" benefits like health insurance nor should the "drivers" be allowed to unionize (that's what employees do BTW). They want to have their cake and eat it too. Not only in MA but in other States the discussion is escalating. I don't understand why legitimate businesses (taxi companies) are not compared more with these "technology" companies. Maybe the playing field should be leveled. https://lnkd.in/eCqGTfjt

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics