BCG’s analysis has benchmarked the world’s 150 largest publicly traded energy companies on average annual total shareholder return from 2019 through 2023. Across the 13 sub-sectors analyzed, a 30% gap was found, on average, between the top- and bottom-performing companies. Top performers consistently created more value than their direct peers in the same macroeconomic context. Dive deeper into the data in our latest analysis: https://lnkd.in/gvseHmHh
Thomas Baker’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
BCG’s analysis has benchmarked the world’s 150 largest publicly traded energy companies on average annual total shareholder return from 2019 through 2023. Across the 13 sub-sectors analyzed, a 30% gap was found, on average, between the top- and bottom-performing companies. Top performers consistently created more value than their direct peers in the same macroeconomic context. Dive deeper into the data in our latest analysis: https://lnkd.in/ecrEcXx2
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
BCG’s analysis has benchmarked the world’s 150 largest publicly traded energy companies on average annual total shareholder return from 2019 through 2023. Across the 13 sub-sectors analyzed, a 30% gap was found, on average, between the top- and bottom-performing companies. Top performers consistently created more value than their direct peers in the same macroeconomic context. Dive deeper into the data in our latest analysis: https://lnkd.in/d_wve43e
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
BCG’s analysis has benchmarked the world’s 150 largest publicly traded energy companies on average annual total shareholder return from 2019 through 2023. Across the 13 sub-sectors analyzed, a 30% gap was found, on average, between the top- and bottom-performing companies. Top performers consistently created more value than their direct peers in the same macroeconomic context. Dive deeper into the data in our latest analysis: https://lnkd.in/dy8CAF6z
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
BCG’s analysis has benchmarked the world’s 150 largest publicly traded energy companies on average annual total shareholder return from 2019 through 2023. Across the 13 sub-sectors analyzed, a 30% gap was found, on average, between the top- and bottom-performing companies. Top performers consistently created more value than their direct peers in the same macroeconomic context. Dive deeper into the data in our latest analysis: https://lnkd.in/eS4evQDk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
BCG’s analysis has benchmarked the world’s 150 largest publicly traded energy companies on average annual total shareholder return from 2019 through 2023. Across the 13 sub-sectors analyzed, a 30% gap was found, on average, between the top- and bottom-performing companies. Top performers consistently created more value than their direct peers in the same macroeconomic context. Dive deeper into the data in our latest analysis: https://lnkd.in/gzKxfmqu
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
BCG’s analysis has benchmarked the world’s 150 largest publicly traded energy companies on average annual total shareholder return from 2019 through 2023. Across the 13 sub-sectors analyzed, a 30% gap was found, on average, between the top- and bottom-performing companies. Top performers consistently created more value than their direct peers in the same macroeconomic context. Dive deeper into the data in our latest analysis: https://lnkd.in/dDeZybqf
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
My colleagues at BCG benchmarked the world’s 150 largest publicly traded energy companies on average annual total shareholder return from 2019 through 2023. Across the 13 sub-sectors analyzed, a 30% gap was found, on average, between the top- and bottom-performing companies. Top performers consistently created more value than their direct peers in the same macroeconomic context. Dive deeper into the data in our latest analysis: https://lnkd.in/gE8QwPaK
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
BCG report, Six Lessons from Energy's Top Performers, shows how top performers in the energy industry excelled in all six key dimensions: revenue growth, cost management, balance sheet health, shareholder payouts, valuation multiple stability, and deal making. They have indeed been consistently creating more shareholder value than their direct peers in the same macroeconomic environment amid the ongoing global effort to secure affordable and clean energy. In closing, BCG’s analysis of total shareholder returns in the energy sector from 2019 through 2023 reveals that in the final analysis “success hinges on the ability to balance immediate priorities with long-term strategic goals” and companies with the highest shareholder returns have done just that, effectively managing capital allocation trade-offs between reinvestment decisions, shareholder payouts, and balance sheet improvements. Read the report here: https://lnkd.in/g5WszPYv
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Did you know that top-performing companies in the energy sector achieved double the revenue growth and were 35% more effective at cost management compared to their peers? Success in this sector depends on balancing immediate priorities with long-term strategic goals. This balancing act becomes more attainable with the proven strategies of the sector's top performers. Learn more about these strategies in our latest analysis: https://lnkd.in/dn732wMN
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Did you know that top-performing companies in the energy sector achieved double the revenue growth and were 35% more effective at cost management compared to their peers? Success in this sector depends on balancing immediate priorities with long-term strategic goals. This balancing act becomes more attainable with the proven strategies of the sector's top performers. Learn more about these strategies in our latest analysis: https://lnkd.in/g8DwvQvu
To view or add a comment, sign in
Vice President Energy & Utilities
9moI really enjoyed this analysis, Thomas! I found it interesting that the best performers are actively deal making and trading their portfolio. Whilst the top performers are great at this, I wonder about the firms that are not good at timing / trading and how much that is destroying value. To what extent do investors want a firm they own to itself be a portfolio manager... doesn't that increase risk and reduce the control of investors who otherwise would create their own portfolios to balance risk / reward and diversify.