Todd Busler’s Post

View profile for Todd Busler

CEO @ Champify | Helping GTM teams turn existing relationships into new business

If you’re an early stage startup between $250k-$1.5M/ARR, here’s how you comp your first sales hire: BACKGROUND Early stage comp plans during ZIPR were insane. $300-400k OTEs with effective quotas of $250-400k/year were not uncommon. This was driven by companies raising gobs of capital AND trying to compete with mature companies offering generous ramp times, draws, and big OTEs. It’s a tricky situation for early founders. Founders don’t yet have the sales yield where a rep can bring in 5-6x their OTE in bookings. Yet, they still need to bring in top talent and pay close to market rate to attract them. So what do you do? Here's how I would structure the first comp plan (shoutout Jason M. Lemkin): The rep doesn’t get paid commission until they pay for themselves. Once they pay for themselves in terms of base salary, they start getting a hefty commission rate with accelerators. EXAMPLE: Market rate for the type of a rep you need is ~$180k OTE or $90k/year base ($7.5k/mo). They do not make any commission until they close their first $7.5k/mo or $22.5k/quarter. Once they go above that, they make a flat commission of all deals of 18% (this rate is based on rough goal of what you think is possible + getting right around the market rate). Assuming they can sell ~$600k/year (based on real historicals, not out of whack expectations based on other markets/companies), then they would end up making: $90k base $108k variable $198k total Equity should be a part of this plan but most early reps are joining for cash upside more than anything else. WHY I LIKE THIS PLAN: It gives sellers a lot of upside – the best AEs know they should be able to maximize the revenue from each new lead or opportunity It’s simple – complex comp plans are dangerous and ripe for gaming You attract the right type of talent – ones that want to bet on themselves and see the upside in closing the next big deal, having the biggest quarter, etc. WHAT TO DO IF THE REP START CRUSHING IT: The CEO of Qualtrics said he had 25 year olds making $500k/yr selling Qualtrics from his basement. They raised no money at the time so it was more evenly distributed toward variable comp. The 4th and 5th rep are taking less risk and it should be much easier to sell with proven customers, reputable logos, and a bit of awareness. It’s completely reasonable for them to get a smaller % of every deal. What I’ve found is that you can use equity to get people aligned to long term goals while continuing to make a lot of cash. The best reps realize they can make a lot of money over time OR you get them into a management track with more equity and less cash upside. TAKEAWAY: The market has adjusted back to reality. There are still deeply funded and extremely profitable companies that are hard to compete with. A straight forward, variable heavy plan with a lot of upside will attracts the right sales talent. Then, do everything humanly possible to keep them drowning in pipeline and excited.

Nash Roberts

VP Sales and Syndication at Carofin - MBA Candidate, Duke Fuqua School of Business

1mo

This is really helpful Todd. Thanks for sharing!

-Vaughn Soratos-

AppDev | Disney Dad | Engineering Services | Cloud Consulting

1mo

The model has been around for a long time. Big box gyms still use a sales draw before reps start getting commission. I don't see a plan like that attracting Top AE talent that early startups need though. Especially CA startups or NYC/Boston Startups. You'll need to be at $250k OTE min. Personally, I'd tier the commission based on the monthly or quarterly quota need.

Ira Ko

Founder | Shapeshift

1mo

Now can you do one for pipegen / marketing

Like
Reply
Steven Brady

Sales needs more "AI" (Authentic Interactions) | Taking your MRR from WTF? -> LFG! | Moved to Lisbon for the two hour lunches 🍽️

1mo

Great post. Have done the “cover your seat then straight % of revenue” plan myself before and find it creates the best incentive alignment

most first sales hires aren’t pulling $250K OTE, especially in early-stage SaaS. plus, the draw model works in industries where reps can ramp fast. but startups need sellers who can build AND close (two things) A tiered commission structure could work but keep them drowning in pipeline (makes them see the upside fast)

Like
Reply
Adamya Kumar

AR/VR Technology Enthusiast | Connecting People | Building Relationships | Full-Stack developer | MERN Stack | Graph-ql | NextJs | Php | Three-Fiber | Socket.io

1mo

Great insights! A transparent, performance-based comp plan can truly attract top talent while keeping them motivated for long-term success.

Like
Reply
Roshan Kumar

Automated. Optimized. Sequified | CEO at Sequifi

1mo

Early stage startups need a simple, variable-heavy comp plan with real upside for sales reps. Align cash, equity, and incentives to attract top talent and drive results.

Like
Reply

“Keep them drowning in pipeline and excited” What a way to end the post! Have a great weekend 🫡

Raúl López

Top-Rated SEO Specialist | Consulting & Implementation | 7+ Years Experience | Helping Companies Grow Traffic, Rankings & Revenue in German, English & Spanish Markets

1mo

A comp plan with strong upside brings in reps who back themselves. Keeping them busy with a strong pipeline matters just as much.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics