
Welcome to the Monday edition of The Cooler, where schadenfreude is the Minnesota equivalent of winning the Super Bowl. Let's get to it.
Any NFL season that advances far enough that the Vikings are no longer playing while others still are — so basically, every season in almost my entire lifetime, given that I was 2 months old the last time the Vikings played in the Super Bowl — offers fans of the purple a lot of "lesser of two evils" propositions when picking a side to root for in a playoff game.
So many teams have wronged the Vikings over the years that my best friend since age 12 wrote a book about it a decade ago and it is in urgent need of an update.
Usually, there's a dilemma. In the wild card round, did you at least passively root for the Seahawks (Blair Walsh game!) or Cowboys (Drew Pearson!) when they met?
That said, there are a few teams in the NFC that it's hard to muster up too much hate for if you are a bitter and angry Vikings fan. And the Rams are one of them.
The Vikings are 5-2 all-time against the Rams in the playoffs. Even if you're bitter about how the greatest show on turf knocked the Vikings from the 1999 playoffs with a 49-37 victory, you probably understand that the outcome was justified and earned.
The Saints, though, still hold a villainous place in Vikings' fans hearts for the events of the 2009 season — Bountygate and the brutality unleashed on Brett Favre in the NFC title game, one of the most painful what-if games in purple history.
Rooting interest in Sunday's NFC title game, then, was easy.